Ramanujacharya

Sankarshana is no different from Krishna. The immediate expansion of Krishna. Why the confusion I don't understand. Krishna is the supreme and so is sankarshana or any of his incarnation may be direct or empowered. Its all spiritual. Vaikuntha or goloka krishnastu bhagawan swayam. When this is the case nothing to worry Long, long afterwards, the Lord himself will come down on earth as a Tridanda Sanyasin, to restore the good law. At that time heretics and men of perverted intellects will confuse the minds of the people. Asuric Sastras, based upon fallacious arguments and various schools of thought, very attractive and almost indistinguishable from the Vedanta, will turn away mens' hearts from Vishnu and cause them to forget His glory. That glorious incarnation will, through the good fortune of the Lord's devotees, come down upon earth, to explain and amplify the teachings of the great Sage Badaraayana and the divine singer of the Gita. The holy one would compose a Bhashya on the Vyasa Sutras, to save men from the confusion and despair caused by spurious doctrines and lead them to the True faith. This is a reference to Ramanujacharya's composition of the Sri Bhashya, his famous commentary on the Brahma Sutras. In any case, note that this does not contradict Ramanujacharya being an incarnation of Adiseshan, because as I discuss in The other citation is from the Yadavachala Mahatmya (AKA the Yadavagiri Mahatmya) of the Narada Purana: His primal manifestation was as Ananta; hi...