Vienna protocol

  1. U.S. withdraws from international accords, says U.N. world court 'politicized'
  2. Repeated low
  3. Office of General Counsel > Law of War > Treaty Documents
  4. Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons


Download: Vienna protocol
Size: 8.19 MB

U.S. withdraws from international accords, says U.N. world court 'politicized'

U.S. National Security Advisor John Bolton answers a question from a reporter about how he refers to Palestine during a news conference in the White House briefing room in Washington, U.S., October 3, 2018. REUTERS/Leah Millis The U.S. national security adviser John Bolton slammed the highest United Nations tribunal as “politicized and ineffective” as he announced that the United States would review all international agreements that could expose it to binding decisions by the ICJ. Earlier on Wednesday the ICJ handed a victory to Tehran, ordering the United States to ensure that sanctions against Iran, due to be tightened next month, do not affect humanitarian aid or civil aviation safety. Tehran had argued that the U.S. sanctions imposed since May by the Trump administration violated the terms their 1955 Treaty of Amity. Washington responded by pulling out of the treaty, a little-known agreement that was signed long before Iran’s 1979 Islamic Revolution that turned the two countries into arch enemies. The ICJ, based in The Hague, in the Netherlands, is the United Nations’ venue for resolving disputes between nations. There have been mounting concerns among U.S. allies about the Trump administration’s commitment to multilateralism. In the nearly two years since being elected, President Donald Trump has withdrawn the United States from a nuclear agreement between six powers and Iran, pulled out of a global climate accord, left the U.N. cultural agency, and threatened NATO mi...

Repeated low

Abstract 1560 Objectives: In 1996 we described the Vienna protocol based upon a dose of 1,1GBq (30mCi) Sm-153-EDTMP administered 5 times in 3 months intervals on an outpatient base followed by 5 further applications in 6- and then in 9 months intervals. Methods: 200 patients suffering from hormone refractory prostate cancer (49-93a) with >1 bone lesion and/or bone pain receiving the 1st year therapy are presented. Bone uptake intraindividually was rather constant (<+/-5%)with a high interindividual variation from 36% to 85% (mean=58,6%). Results: Pain palliation was achieved completely in 53%, partially in 41% and failed in 6%. Duration of analgetic effect shortest was 8 weeks. PSA decreased in 21%, was stable in 48% and increased in 12%. A temporary increase (4-8 weeks) was observed in 19% followed by a longer lasting decrease. Flare phenomenon was rare (4%). Nadir of platelets (28,7d) was followed by white (30,7d) and red blood cells (37,7d). Lesion regression assessed by scintigraphy and MR was first seen after 2nd therapy (2%), increasing after 5th application to 41%. No predictive parameter as to the response was discovered. Decrease in PSA and adhesion molecules (ICAM, VCAM, E-selectin, nadir at 9-12 weeks) was significantly more pronounced in patients on statin treatment and positively correlated to red blood cells (r=0,73) and haemoglobin (r=0,75). Repeated therapy induced a further decrease. Quality of life, analgetics consumption, pain and Karnovsky score and WHO...

Office of General Counsel > Law of War > Treaty Documents

In addition to the For many years, the Department of State has published annually Treaties in Force, a listing of treaties and other international agreements in force for the United States. Treaties in Force has provided helpful information about such treaties, including the date of U.S. ratification and a listing of other Parties to each treaty or other international agreement. This webpage is a work-in-progress, and we hope to update it with additional documents. If you have any comments, such as suggestions of other useful documents to include, please let us know by emailing us. Click any column header to sort table data. 1949 Geneva Conventions and 2005 Additional Protocol III U.S. Documents Regarding the 1949 Geneva Conventions and 2005 Additional Protocol III The Final Record of the Diplomatic Conference of Geneva of 1949 1977 Additional Protocol I and Additional Protocol II to the 1949 Geneva Conventions to Which the United States is not a Party U.S. Documents Regarding the 1977 Additional Protocol I and Additional Protocol II to the 1949 Geneva Conventions 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties to Which the United States is Not a Party U.S. Documents Regarding the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1954 Hague Cultural Property Convention U.S. Documents Regarding the 1954 Hague Cultural Property Convention Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) and Its Protocols U.S. Documents Regarding the CCW a...

Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons

The Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons, Protocol IV of the 1980 History [ ] The Blinding Weapons. Protocol text [ ] Article 1 [ ] It is prohibited to employ Article 2 [ ] In the employment of laser systems, the High Contracting Parties shall take all feasible precautions to avoid the incidence of permanent blindness to unenhanced vision. Such precautions shall include training of their armed forces and other practical measures. Article 3 [ ] Blinding as an incidental or collateral effect of the legitimate military employment of laser systems, including laser systems used against optical equipment, is not covered by the prohibition of this Article 4 [ ] For the purpose of this protocol "permanent blindness" means irreversible and uncorrectable loss of vision which is seriously disabling with no prospect of recovery. Serious disability is equivalent to visual acuity of less than 20/200 Historical significance [ ] ICRC welcomed the ban on blinding lasers as "a significant breakthrough in international humanitarian law," adding: The prohibition, in advance, of the use of an abhorrent new weapon the production and proliferation of which appeared imminent is an historic step for humanity. It represents the first time since 1868, when the use of exploding bullets This was also the first international agreement regulating use of lasers during war. Limitations [ ] The Protocol does not prohibit attacks against binoculars, periscopes, telescopes, and other optical equipment because ...