What did nupur sharma said about prophet muhammad

Last weekend, Indian vice-president Venkaiah Naidu was in the emirate of Qatar to inaugurate a “ Trade between the two countries, at over $15.03 billion (1.16 lakh crore rupees) in 2021-2022, was expected to grow further in the years ahead, with this new platform meant to boost collaboration between the two countries’ startup sectors. All that now hangs in the balance. By the time Naidu was readying for a dinner meeting yesterday with Abdullah bin Hamad Al Thani, the deputy emir of Qatar, the ripples of Sharma’s comments against Islam’s founder had reached Qatar. Naidu’s dinner with Al Thani was cancelled, although the reason cited was covid-19. A press conference scheduled for Naidu on the next day, too, was nixed. Qatar isn’t alone. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Iran have now raised concerns with the Indian government. Incidents like these, they said, were proof of how unsafe Muslims were in India. As a diplomatic crisis began to snowball in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region, Indian envoys were summoned to explain the country’s position. Today (June 6), the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, which has 57 member states, also Just a day ago, though, India’s envoys, like the one in Qatar, had alluded to Sharma and Jindal as “ Qatar has welcomed these steps but has said that it awaits an official apology and a public condemnation of these remarks by the Indian government. At the heart of the action taken by the BJP and India’s envoys lies India’s $156 billion trade wit...

• A judge who was a member of the Supreme Court panel criticized Nupur Sharma of the BJP. • Her remarks regarding Prophet Muhammad(PBUH) made strong statements about personal attacks on judges for their decisions today. • He stated that personal attacks on judges for their judgments lead to a dangerous environment. • A judge who was a member of the Supreme Court panel criticized Nupur Sharma of the BJP. • Her remarks regarding Prophet Muhammad(PBUH) made strong statements about personal attacks on judges for their decisions today. • He stated that personal attacks on judges for their judgments lead to a dangerous environment. A judge who was a member of the Supreme Court panel that criticized Nupur Sharma of the BJP for her remarks regarding the Prophet Muhammad made strong statements about personal attacks on judges for their decisions today. At a ceremony, Justice JB Pardiwala, a member of the bench that said the former BJP spokesperson needed to apologize to the entire country, remarked: 'Personal attacks on judges for their judgments lead to a dangerous environment.' 3 Her remarks regarding Prophet Muhammad(PBUH) made strong statements about personal attacks on judges for their decisions today. After making oral remarks against Nupur Sharma during the hearing of her petition, both Justices Pardiwala and Surya Kant came under fire on social media from individuals. In order to have all First Information Reports filed against her across the nation combined and sent to Del...

Lately, Nupur Sharma, 37-year-old firebrand, superstar BJP spokesperson, has kicked up such a controversy as to cause the Muslim world to feel a big jolt, particularly in the Middle East region, so much so that some of the Arab world Muslim nations have withdrawn from or suspended trade and commerce relationships with India. The whole story not once clearly explained by the media, both mainstream and social, is just a very simple one without much substance: Some Hindu activist discovered the fact that the Gyanvapi Mosque located in Banaras, Uttar Pradesh, was actually constructed by Aurangzeb in 1669 upon demolition of an older Shiva temple. So, as usual, a hue and cry ensued and Hindu frontliners demanded right to enter the mosque portals and perform Hindu rituals and pray in the premises. The matter eventually reached law courts; and the matter after having been initially heard by nearly all jurisdiction courts including the Supreme Court remains subjudice today. When Hindus made demands of entry, rather vociferously, the Muslim defendants resisted saying that the ‘Shiv Ling’ found there after excavation is not a deity but a man-carved fountainhead. As the controversy was still raging, television sharks kept organising talk shows to let the people know the truth by construing their conclusions from the cacophonic debates of the shows. The Times Now organised one at which the commendably-articulate polyglot Nupur, while trying to negate and neutralise a Muslim respondent’...