What is the problem with the periodisation of indian history that james mill offer

The problem with the periodisation of Indian history by James Mill is that he divided the Indian history into Hindu, Muslim and the British period. It has been argued by many historians that it is not correct to periodise the Indian history on the basis of religion of the rulers.For example, many different religions coexisted peacefully when the country was ruled by Hindu kings. The problem with the periodsation of Indian history that name mill offers is the superiority of British shown over Hindu and Muslim James mill has put Indian history into three periods Hindu,Muslims and British claiming that it was necessary to introduce European manners arts institutions and laws in India James mill views have several defends. James mill divided indian history into three periods - hindu ,muslim and British .this periodisation has its own problem.It is difficult to refer to any period of history as hindu or muslim because of variety of faiths existed simultaneously in these periods .it is also not justified to characterize an age through the religion of the rulers of the time .what it suggest is that the lives and practice of others don't really matter .it is worth mentioning that even rulers in ancient India did not all share the same faith.

• العربية • Aragonés • Azərbaycanca • বাংলা • Български • Català • Čeština • Dansk • Deutsch • Eesti • Español • Esperanto • فارسی • Français • 한국어 • हिन्दी • Bahasa Indonesia • Íslenska • Italiano • עברית • ქართული • Latina • Magyar • مصرى • Bahasa Melayu • Nederlands • 日本語 • Norsk bokmål • ਪੰਜਾਬੀ • Polski • Português • Русский • Scots • Slovenščina • Suomi • Svenska • Tagalog • தமிழ் • Татарча / tatarça • తెలుగు • Türkçe • Українська • اردو • 中文 • Action Party • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • People's Radical Party • • • • • • • • • Progressive Party • • • • • • • • • • • Radical Democratic Party • • • • • • • • Radical Liberal Party • • • • • • • Radical Party • • • • • • Radical Party of Chile • • • • Radical People's Party • • • • • • Radical Socialist Party • • • • • Radicals of the Left • • • • • Republican Left • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • v • t • e James Mill (born James Milne; Mill was the father of Biography [ ] James Milne, later known as James Mill, was born in Northwater Bridge, in the parish of Logie Pert, [ which?], resolved that he should receive a first-rate education, and after the parish school they sent him on to the In October 1789, he was ordained as a Autobiography, his father, though "educated in the creed of Scotch Presbyterianism, had, by his own studies and reflections, been early led to reject not only the belief in ...

In 1817, James Mill, a Scottish economist and a political philosopher, published A History of British India in three volumes. He divided Indian history into three periods—Hindu, Muslim and British. It has been argued by many historians that it is not correct to periodise Indian history on the basis of religion of the rulers. For example, when the Hindu kings ruled in ancient India, many religions existed peacefully. The same is also true for mediaeval India. It was not correct to periodise mediaeval India as Muslim History because people belonging to different faiths existed during this time. Such periodisation which was based on the religion of the rulers suggests that the lives, practices and culture of the other people do not matter. Question Description What was the problem with the periodisation of James mill? for Class 8 2023 is part of Class 8 preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Class 8 exam syllabus. Information about What was the problem with the periodisation of James mill? covers all topics & solutions for Class 8 2023 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for What was the problem with the periodisation of James mill?. Here you can find the meaning of What was the problem with the periodisation of James mill? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of What was the problem with the periodisation of James mill?, a detailed solution fo...

Hint: In 1817, a Scottish economist and political philosopher, James Mill published a three-volume work, named “A History of British India”. In his work, he divided Indian history into three periods- Hindu, Muslim and British. This periodisation by James Mill was widely accepted. Complete answer: We often divide history into periods to understand the significance of the past. It throws light on each and every chapter or event of the past thus we demarcate the lines between, stages, periods, and mark them according to their historical importance. The same thing was done by the famous political philosopher, James Mill. But there were problems with the way Mill periodise Indian History. According to him, Asian societies were less developed and modern than in European countries. He said that earlier India was ruled by despots, dominated with religious intolerance, caste system, and superstition. Therefore it is important for Asian societies to have Britishers as their rulers so that they can uplift them and make them more civilised. He also suggested the implementation of modern art, education, institutions and laws in India. He in fact suggested that only Britishers can bring enlightenment and happiness in Indian society and without their support Indian society cannot be developed. Note: The biggest problem lies in the way James Mill periodise Indian History on the basis of religion. As we have seen how different religions existed peacefully in the past and had shown unity. A...

James Mill thought that all Asian societies were at a lower level of civilisation than Europe. In his prejudiced version of history, British rule represented all the forces of progress and civilisation while the period before British rule represents darkness, ignorance, despotism, religious intolerance, caste taboos, superstitious practices, etc.However, the periodisation of Indian history based only on religion is problematic for several reasons. A variety of faiths, apart from Hinduism and Islam, existed in the periods categorised as Hindu and Muslim by Mill. Also, it is not right to classify an age according to the religion of the rulers of that time. By doing so it suggests that the lives and practices of others did not matter. Another point to keep in mind is that all rulers in ancient India did not share the same faith.