Nupur sharma

Nupur Sharma (born 23 April 1985) is an Indian politician. She was the national spokesperson of the Early life and education Nupur Sharma was born in New Delhi in 1985. Sharma studied in the Political career Sharma became a worker of the Afterwards, she was appointed as an official spokesperson for the BJP's Delhi unit under Comments about Muhammad See also: On 26 May 2022, Sharma participated in a debate on the A police bandh (shut down) was called by a Muslim organization in On 5 June, the Grand Mufti of Oman became the first significant figure from outside India to take issue with Sharma. Describing the remarks as "insolent and obscene rudeness", he called for a boycott of all Indian products and confiscation of all Indian investments in Oman. By the evening of 5 June, Sharma was suspended from the BJP. The party statement said, "The BJP strongly denounces insults of any religious personalities of any religion." In June, a police team of On January 2023, she received a Notes • ^ a b Abhinav Rajput (5 June 2022), The Indian Express • Geeta Pandey (7 June 2022), BBC News, Brash and articulate, her ability to argue and put forth her point of view in both English and Hindi won her a place in the BJP's media committee for the 2013 Delhi assembly elections. • The Times of India, 7 June 2022, In 2020, the BJP appointed her as a national spokesperson. The 37-year-old was often seen on TV debates energetically arguing with her opponents and was often noted for using brash langua...

Shortly after being suspended from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) over her controversial remarks on Prophet Mohammad, party spokesperson Nupur Sharma on Sunday issued an apology, saying that her intention was not to hurt anyone. Nupur Sharma's remarks against Prophet Mohammad led to widespread condemnation in the country and also triggered violent clashes in Kanpur on Friday.(HT file photo) Recently, Sharma was on a TV news debate show over the Gyanvapi Mosque issue in Varanasi where she made controversial remarks against Prophet. Also Read| Amid furore over comments on Prophet, BJP suspends Nupur Sharma, expels Naveen Jindal Her remarks led to widespread condemnation in the country and also triggered violent clashes in Uttar Pradesh's Kanpur on Friday. “I have been taking part in TV debates for the past many days, where my 'Aaradhya' Lord Shiva was being insulted. It was said in front of me that it is not Shivling but a fountain that can be found on every footpath of Delhi and one should go and worship those,” Sharma tweeted in Hindi. “I could not tolerate the repeated insults made against Lord Shiva and I said some things in rage. I take back my words if they have hurt anyone's religious sentiments,” Sharma added. Her reference was in the context of Hindu litigants' claim that a shivling was found on the Gyanvapi complex during a court-ordered survey conducted last month. Also Read| AAP’s Saurabh Bharadwaj says he sympathises with Nupur Sharma, then makes a point on BJ...

Not entertaining her plea to club FIRs against her in different states with the one in Delhi over her remarks on the Prophet, the Supreme Court Friday came down heavily on suspended BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma, saying she has a “loose tongue” and is “single-handedly responsible for what is happening in the country” including in Udaipur where a tailor was hacked to death this week for allegedly sharing her remarks. Stating that Sharma should have “apologised to the nation”, the vacation bench of Justices Surya Kant and J B Pardiwala pulled her up for approaching the Supreme Court directly. Nupur Sharma | Sharma’s petition was filed under the name N V Sharma and Senior Advocate Maninder Singh, who was representing her, said this was done because there was threat to her life. At this, Justice Surya Kant said, “She has threat or she has become a security threat? The way she has ignited emotions across the country, this lady is single-handedly responsible for what is happening in the country.” Singh said Sharma had tendered a written apology, but Justice Surya Kant said “she was too late to withdraw” and it was done “conditionally saying sentiments hurt”. “We saw the debate on how she was incited. But the way she said all this… and later says she is a lawyer… it is shameful… she should have gone to the TV and apologised to the nation.” “What if she is the spokesperson of a party? She thinks she has back-up power and can make any statement without respect to the law of the lan...