Covid booster dose near me

• The studies Sen. Ron Johnson’s office sent examined COVID vaccine effectiveness, not efficacy. Efficacy refers to how well a vaccine performs in a clinical trial, and each of the vaccines were highly efficacious when they debuted. • Even overlooking that, the claim is off base. The studies do demonstrate waning protection against an omicron infection, but they don’t mean that getting vaccinated caused an increased risk of infection. • What’s more, the goal of the vaccines wasn’t to block infection – it was to prevent severe illness and death, which the same studies show is still happening. Once he was re-elected for his third term, U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., said he Johnson has long questioned the safety of the shots, pursuing theories that Johnson was asked about the issue in an April 24, After saying he was attacked for claiming that natural immunity from infection would be "stronger" than the vaccine, Johnson threw in a new argument. The vaccine "has been proven to have negative efficacy," he said. In other words, he’s claiming that instead of offering you protection from COVID-19, the vaccine causes you to be more at risk from the illness. Experts say he’s wrong. Let’s take a peek. Efficacy versus effectiveness When asked for backup, Johnson’s office pointed us to three things: First, Each of the studies Johnson’s office sent measure effectiveness, not efficacy. The vaccines Those trials also set out to see how well the vaccines protected against severe illness a...