Deepti sharma mankad

Charlie Dean of Southern Vipers smiles after she jokingly pretended to run out Northern Diamonds’ Linsey Smith at the non strikers end on Sunday. Photograph: Dave Vokes/Shutterstock Charlie Dean of Southern Vipers smiles after she jokingly pretended to run out Northern Diamonds’ Linsey Smith at the non strikers end on Sunday. Photograph: Dave Vokes/Shutterstock Dean was run out at the non-striker’s end having previously looked comfortable at the crease, hitting 47 at No 9 as the hosts closed in on what would have been an unlikely victory. Sharma took the bails off after entering her delivery stride for the final wicket of the women’s international summer, securing a 3-0 ODI series victory for the tourists. In a statement on its website, the It added: “Respectful debate is healthy and should continue, as where one person sees the bowler as breaching the Spirit in such examples, another will point at the non-striker gaining an unfair advantage by leaving their ground early.” England’s Charlie Dean is consoled by Freya Davies after her decisive wicket handed victory to India on Saturday. Photograph: Peter Cziborra/Action Images/Reuters It is a rare form of dismissal but has been used before, including by Indian bowlers Vinoo Mankad – after whom it has traditionally been known – and Ravichandran Ashwin. There has previously been an unwritten convention to offer the batter a warning, though the relevant law was recently moved by the International Charlie Dean with a 'M̶a̶n̶k̶a̶...

• • • ‘Confused’ Ben Stokes’ Tweet on Deepti Sharma’s Mankad Goes Viral, Says Why People Are Comparing it to a Ball Deflecting Off My Bat ‘Confused’ Ben Stokes’ Tweet on Deepti Sharma’s Mankad Goes Viral, Says Why People Are Comparing it to a Ball Deflecting Off My Bat Ben Stokes is now the latest English cricketer to have a say about the incident, where the confused England Test skipper asked on Twitter that why a mankad has been constantly compared with the 2019 World Cup Final deflected boundary off his bat. We all know how England got valuable four runs in the Final, when a diving Ben Stokes got bonus runs as the throw from the Kiwi fielder hit the 31-year old's bat which eventually raced down to the fence. (Image: Twitter) New Delhi: Deepti Sharma Mankad act hogged unnecessary limelight as she mankaded English batter Charlotte Dean to seal the whitewash for India on Saturday. The Harmanpreet Kaur-led side won the match by 16 runs and in the process completed the historic whitewash. But it was the Deepti moment that created a controversy which has been the reason of upset for the last two days for the English fans and cricketers. We all know how England got valuable four runs in the Final, when a diving Ben Stokes got bonus runs as the throw from the Kiwi fielder hit the 31-year old’s bat which eventually raced down to the fence. Many Indian fans have called it against the ‘Spirit of the Game’ after Deepti’s legal mankad faced a lot of heat from the England fans. Why a...

Deepti Sharma Mankad : Heather Knight accuses Deepti Sharma of lying : Injured England skipper Heather Knight hit back at the India all-rounder Deepti Sharma and accused her of “lying” and said that there were no warnings given to Charlotte Dean. Follow IND-W vs ENG-W live updates with InsideSport.IN The chatter has not stopped yet on India’s Deepti Sharma running out England’s Charlotte Dean at the non-striker’s end in the 44th over of the innings. Many players came in support of Deepti while others have different opinions and stand with Charlotte. Heather Knight, the designated England captain, missed the series against India as she was undergoing hip surgery. Knight took to Twitter and said, “The game is over, Charlie was dismissed legitimately. India were deserved winners of the match and the series. But no warnings were given. Deepti Sharma Mankad: England captain Heather Knight SLAMS India for ‘lying about warnings’, says ‘no warnings were given’ They don’t need to be given, so it hasn’t made the dismissal any less legitimate.”“But if they’re comfortable with the decision to affect the runout, India shouldn’t feel the need to justify it by lying about warnings,” Knight further added in her tweet on Monday. Earlier in the day, Deepti Sharma said that it was a plan, but one that was developed only after numerous warnings to Dean, who stopped in the middle of her bowling motion and pulled off the bails at the non-striker’s end to complete a 3-0 sweep of England. “It was...

In the third and final One-Day international (ODI) between the Indian and English women’s teams at Lord’s on 24 September, England needed 17 runs to win off the remaining 39 balls but with just one wicket left. As Deepti Sharma came in to bowl, non-striker Charlotte Dean started to leave her crease. Instead of delivering the ball, Sharma dislodged the bails at her end. Television replays show that when Sharma struck the wicket, Dean was at least six feet out, not even watching the bowler, and anxiously on her way to take a run. She was declared out, rightfully, and India won a clean 3-0 sweep of the series. What Sharma did was absolutely within the rules of the game, though there has traditionally been a bit of a shadow over this mode of dismissal, known as “Mankading”, after the great Indian all-rounder Vinoo Mankad. In the Sydney Test against Australia in 1947, Mankad noticed that non-striker Bill Brown was frequently out of the crease. He broke the stumps. This act generated a hue and cry about the “spirit of cricket”, similar to the one we are witnessing now about Sharma. Mankad’s was the first dismissal of its type in international cricket, though there had been at least 17 such instances in first-class cricket before this. The first one dates as far back as 1835, 52 years before even the first Test match was played—George Baigent run out by Thomas Barker in a Sussex versus Nottinghamshire match. As far we know, no “spirit of the game” issues were raised for these occ...

The three-match ODI series between India and England came to The incident brought to an end a low-scoring thriller.(Twitter) The circumstances of her dismissal has drawn extremely polarised reactions - Deepti had run Dean out while the latter was backing up, an action that is commonly known as the ‘Mankad’. While the on-air commentators and England captain Amy Jones expressed their displeasure at the manner of dismissal, India captain Harmanpreet Kaur staunchly defended her team mate, stating that the dismissal showed Deepti's awareness. The England dressing room was visibly shocked by the dismissal. The decision had been sent to the third umpire by the onfield umpires to check if Deepti was in her delivery stride when Dean had walked out of the crease. Dean herself was in tears when the dismissal was confirmed but she also went and shook hands with the Indians as soon as the third umpire's decision was announced. Harmanpreet said that she was surprised that she was asked about the last wicket and not the rest of the nine in the presentation ceremony. o be honest, I thought you will ask about all the 10 wickets which was not easy to take as well [on being probed about the last wicket]. It's part of the game I don't think we have done something new. It shows your awareness, what batters are doing. I will back my players, she hasn't done something outside the rules.