Drive social media lawsuit

Social media can delete posts, but this isn't the same as censorship. getty On Wednesday social media influencer Justin Hart announced that he had filed a federal lawsuit against social media giants Facebook and Twitter, as well as against President Joe Biden, and the U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy for violating his First Amendment rights to free speech. Hart, who is a data analyst and digital strategist, claims that the federal government has colluded with social media companies to monitor, flag, suspend and even delete social media posts it deems to contain "misinformation." "The recent admission that the White House has a team of government workers flagging Americans’ social media posts for removal is extremely disturbing, and it’s illegal," Brian Kelsey, managing attorney at the Liberty Justice Center said in an emailed statement to this reporter. "Regardless of one's politics or views about COVID, every citizen should be greatly alarmed by this melding of Big Government and Big Tech to control what you see, hear and know about one of the greatest public issues of our time." The lawsuit, Hart v. Facebook, was filed August 31, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. First Amendment Issue? In the emailed statement, Hart questioned the power that social media companies currently maintain, but also suggests that the government is directing companies such as Facebook and Twitter to censor the public on critical issues such as th...

ST. LOUIS — A digital marketing company is suing NextGen Information Services Inc., a Missouri company, citing alleged breach of contract. Drive Social Media LLC filed the complaint on Oct. 11 in the St. Louis Circuit Court against NextGen Information Services Inc., alleging that the Missouri company breached its duty of good faith and fair dealing. According to the complaint, the plaintiff alleges that on Sept. 30, 2016, Drive Social Media LLC suffered economic injury as a result of the defendant's unfair business practices in failing to pay the amount of $27,550 for digital marketing services provided by the plaintiff. This goes against the terms of the written contract lawfully entered into by both parties, the complaint says. The plaintiff holds NextGen Information Services Inc. responsible because the defendant allegedly failed to fulfill its obligations under the contract and received and retained benefits to the expense and detriment of plaintiff. The plaintiff requests a trial by jury and seeks judgment against the defendant for damages in the principal sum of $27,550, plus interest, costs and further relief as the court court deems proper. The plaintiff is represented by Douglas J. Cleveland of Vogler & Associates LLC in St. Louis. St. Louis Circuit Court Case number 1722-CC11507

People Also Read: The $150 billion class-action complaint, filed in California on Monday by law firms Edelson PC and Fields PLLC, argues that Facebook's failure to police content. How to Working at Drive Social Media: 18 Reviews – Indeed Drve Social Media Focuses on the Numbers. Overall, working at Drve Social Media has exposed me to some incredible co-workers, professionals from all sorts of industries and.

Social media and mental health: Who’s affected? Heavy use of the most popular social media platforms — Facebook and Instagram — has been linked to detrimental mental This is an especially urgent situation considering the report issued Tuesday, May 23, 2023, by the United States surgeon general, Dr. Vivek H. Murthy. The report stresses how social media poses a risk of harm to children and adolescents. Recently, powerful internet giant, Meta Platform, Inc. — owner of Facebook and Instagram — has come under fire for putting profits ahead of its users’ mental Meta-Facebook and Instagram, as well as several other top social media platforms, have been accused of creating a toxic environment for young users, increasing engagement at the cost of their mental Young adults and teens, particularly women and girls, who use Facebook, Instagram, and other major social media sites, reported to company researchers in 2019 they felt bad about themselves after using the platforms. Researchers told higher-ups about the mental health problems affecting the rapidly growing teen base of a popular photo-sharing site at the time, but the reports were minimized, In 2021, a former employee of the largest social media platform Facebook, Frances Haugen, blew the whistle on the company’s troubling practices, providing documents to regulators and law enforcement and also Now, social media companies face mounting evidence that they eschewed Do you qualify? The link between social media and mental health...

A major new federal lawsuit playing out this winter argues that social media platforms are "defective" products that can be held legally responsible for harms they cause to younger users. Why it matters: Plaintiffs in the Driving the news: A new master complaint in • The multi-district litigation in California is being heard before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, who • An essential question in this case is whether the sites named in the suits and their algorithms can be considered "products" — and if so, whether the companies can be held liable for product designs that are charged with causing or contributing to harm. Of note: Last week, • In addition, the Supreme Court this year is likely to What they're saying: "When you have a paralyzed legislature, litigation is the only action that's going to push social media companies to make changes and be held accountable," Previn Warren, an attorney at the Motley Rice law firm and co-lead counsel for the multi-district social media lawsuit, told Axios. • "These lawsuits and the Supreme Court case are going to put pressure on these companies, and they're going to have to make design changes, and that is the only path I can see that is likely to create change," he said. Lawyers involved with the case compare the effort to the successful legal campaign against • "What the plaintiffs here are trying to do is something different," Judge Gonzalez Rogers said at a hearing about the case last November, Details: One filing against Meta, bro...

A 16-year-old girl in Utah becomes so obsessed with her body image after getting hooked on Instagram that she develops anorexia and bulimia. A boy from Michigan goes from watching YouTube videos for several hours a day at age 9 to binging all night on TikTok and Snapchat, then ends up sharing a nude photo of himself on Snapchat with a stranger who circulates it widely online. A Connecticut girl struggles for more than two years with an extreme addiction to Instagram and Snapchat before she succumbs to severe sleep deprivation and depression and takes her own life—at age 11. Under the platforms’ terms of use, she shouldn’t even have had accounts before she turned 13. These children and others like them are the face of a novel effort to use litigation to pin responsibility for the alleged dangers of social media on the companies that run the most popular platforms. More than 70 lawsuits have been filed this year against Meta, Snap, ByteDance’s TikTok, and Google centering on claims from adolescents and young adults who say they’ve suffered anxiety, depression, eating disorders, and sleeplessness as a result of their addiction to social media. In at least seven cases, the plaintiffs are the parents of children who’ve died by suicide. The suits make claims of product liability that are new to social media but have echoes of past campaigns against tobacco companies and automobile manufacturers.

Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube and other social media lawsuits claim that social media platforms can cause mental health issues such as eating disorders, self-harm, addiction and more in children and teens. Parents say companies knew the platforms could cause these issues but failed to warn users. Consumernotice.org adheres to the highest ethical standards for content production and distribution. All content is thoroughly researched and verified at each stage of the publication process. Our writers and editors follow strict guidelines for written and visual content, including vetting all sources and verifying quotes and statistics, to guarantee honesty and integrity in our reporting. We collaborate with legal and medical experts and consumer safety professionals to further ensure the accuracy of our content. People are filing social media harm lawsuits because published studies and internal company notes and memorandums link the heavy use of social media to mental health problems among children and teenagers. Issues include social media addiction, anxiety, depression, eating disorders, body dysmorphia, low self-esteem and suicidal ideation Meta faces hundreds of legal claims from parents and families of children and teens who suffered mental health problems after using Facebook and Instagram. School districts are also suing parent companies of Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube and other social media platforms, claiming the platforms “exploited the vulner...