Herbert spencer

The Principles of Sociology, 3 vols. (1898) This is a 3 vol. set of the third revised edition of Herbert Spencer’s magnum opus on sociology which was first published in 1876. In vol. 1 he defines what his theory of sociology is, how human beings associate with each other in communities, how institution evolve over time, and begins his analysis of institutions with a section on the family, marriage, women and children. In vol. 2 he covers “ceremonial” institutions and political institutions (with his famous distinction between militant and industrial types of society). In vol. 3 he discusses ecclesiastical institutions, professional institutions, and “industrial” (or economic) institutions.

Herbert Spencer (1820-1903) On April 27, 1820, English philosopher, biologist, anthropologist, sociologist, and prominent classical liberal political theorist of the Victorian era Herbert Spencer was born. Spencer is best known for the expression “ survival of the fittest“, which he coined in Principles of Biology (1864), after reading Charles Darwin‘s On the Origin of Species.[ Lamarckism.[ “The truth is, that those who have never entered upon scientific pursuits know not a tithe of the poetry by which they are surrounded.” – Herbert Spencer, Lectures on Education delivered at the Royal Institution of Great Britain, London, 1855 Herbert Spencer – Early Years Spencer was born in Derby, England, the son of William George Spencer (generally called George), a religious dissenter. Herbert Spencer was educated partly by his father and partly by members of the Derby Philosophical Society who introduced him to pre-Darwinian concepts of biological evolution. Reverend Thomas Spencer, Herbert Spencer’s uncle, then completed Spencer’s limited formal education by teaching him some mathematics and physics, and enough Latin to enable him to translate some easy texts. The Framework of General Biology Spencer was known to work quite interdisciplinary, being occupied as a civil engineer during the 1830s as well as writing for provincial journals. About a decade later, Spencer served as sub-editor on the free-trade journal The Economist, during which time he published his first book, Social...

Edward L. Youmans (1821–1887), who founded Popular Science Monthly in 1872, was a tireless promoter and popularizer of scientific ideas. In this article, he explains the significance of Herbert Spencer (1820–1903), a British writer who developed a comprehensive account of man, society and nature based on the idea of evolution, the gradual development of more complex forms from simpler elements. As Youmans explains, this was a revolutionary idea, challenging longstanding Biblical ideas of the creation and God’s relation to mankind. Youmans argued that Spencer’s development of the principle of evolution not only predated Darwin’s, but was both more comprehensive and more fundamental. Spencer, who invented the term “survival of the fittest,” had broad influence in the United States. His emphasis on development through time helped make “progress,” a term that, with its cognates, occurred frequently in Youmans’s article, the fundamental principle of political and social thought. As Youmans points out, applying the concepts of evolution and “survival of the fittest” to human beings leads to the idea of “divergent varieties of man, some of them higher than others.” This kind of thinking was a direct inspiration for the eugenics movement in the United States. This movement, in turn, affected popular opinion and law. In 1927, in Buck v. Bell, the Supreme Court ruled that Virginia had the right to sterilize its “feeble minded” citizens. Justice Holmes, who wrote the opinion (only on...

The synthetic philosophy in outline of Herbert Spencer Spencer saw First Principles he argued that there is a fundamental law of matter, which he called the law of the persistence of force, from which it follows that nothing It should be noted that Spencer published his idea of the evolution of biological species before the views of Sociology and social philosophy That Spencer first derived his general evolutionary scheme from reflection on human society is seen in Social Statics, in which see Evolution is not the only biological This The Man Versus the State (1884), he wrote that see the function of liberalism in the past was that of putting a limit to the powers of kings. The function of true liberalism in the future will be that of putting a limit to the powers of parliaments. Nevertheless, Spencer’s view of such ameliorative legislation as a In his emphasis on variety and differentiation, Spencer was unwittingly repeating, in a 19th-century Evaluation Spencer’s attempt to synthesize the sciences showed a

ADVERTISEMENTS: Read this article to learn about the contribution of Herbert Spencer to sociology! Herbert Spencer was born in Derby, England, on 27th April, 1820. He was recognized as one of the important social philosophers of the 19th Century. He had exerted a profound influence in the development of modern Sociology. He was treated as the continuator of Comte’s evolutionary approach. He was much more precise than Comte in specifying special fields for which Sociology must take responsibility. ADVERTISEMENTS: He is believed to be the most notable exponent of social evolution. He is also considered as the father of classical evolutionists. In 1848 he was appointed as an editor of “The Economist”. By 1850, he had completed his first major work, “Social Statics”. He is famous, for his theory of’ Social Evolution’ and Organismic Analogy in the study of Sociology. Some of his important writings are: (i) Principles of Ethics-1891 (ii) Synthetic Philosophy-1896 ADVERTISEMENTS: (iii) Principles of Sociology-1880 (iv) Social Statics-1850 (v) Principle of Biology (vi) The Study of Sociology-1873. Organismic Analogy: An important work of Spencer which was shared with both Comte and Durkheim was his theory of organic analogy in which he developed the tendency to see society as an organism. He borrowed his concepts from biology. ADVERTISEMENTS: He was concerned with overall structure of society, the interrelationship of the parts of society, and the functions of the parts for each o...

Herbert Spencer was born in Derby, Derbyshire, England, on 27th April 1820. His family was of intellectuals and individuals who had earned high ranking and respect in British society. His father William George Spencer was a schoolmaster, a religious dissenter who drifted from Methodism to Quakerism. His schooling was in progressive teaching methods of Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi. He was also secretary of the Derby Philosophical Society, founded in the year 1783 by Erasmus Darwin (the grandfather of Charles Darwin). Herbert’ s mother was Harriet. He grew under the tutelage of his parents and his uncle, the Reverend Thomas Spencer, who taught him Mathematics, Herbert Spencer Books / Works of Herbert Spencer Herbert was a polymath who contributed to a variety of subjects like anthropology, ethics, economics, politics, philosophy, literature. He couldn’t settle into any single intellectual or professional discipline. He was an a self-taught person who acquired most of his knowledge from reading and conversations with his friends and acquaintances. Spencer was also educated in empirical sciences and pre-Darwinian concepts of biological evolution of Erasmus Darwin and Jean-Baptiste Lamarck. Later he served as a sub-editor on the free-trade journal, The Economist, from 1848 to 1853. He also published his first book, Social Statics(1851) during this time. His second book was Principles of Psychology(1855) which explored a physiological basis for psychology. Spencer’s interest in ps...

Herbert Spencer (1820–1903) is typically, though quite wrongly, considered a coarse social Darwinist. After all, Spencer, and not Darwin, coined the infamous expression “survival of the fittest”, leading G. E. Moore to conclude erroneously in Principia Ethica (1903) that Spencer committed the naturalistic fallacy. According to Moore, Spencer’s practical reasoning was deeply flawed insofar as he purportedly conflated mere survivability (a natural property) with goodness itself (a non-natural property). Roughly fifty years later, Richard Hofstadter devoted an entire chapter of Social Darwinism in American Thought (1955) to Spencer, arguing that Spencer’s unfortunate vogue in late nineteenth-century America inspired Andrew Carnegie and William Graham Sumner’s visions of unbridled and unrepentant capitalism. For Hofstadter, Spencer was an “ultra-conservative” for whom the poor were so much unfit detritus. His social philosophy “walked hand in hand” with reaction, making it little more than a “biological apology for laissez-faire” (Hofstadter, 1955: 41 and 46). But just because Carnegie interpreted Spencer’s social theory as justifying merciless economic competition, we shouldn’t automatically attribute such justificatory ambitions to Spencer. Otherwise, we risk uncritically reading the fact that Spencer happened to influence popularizers of social Darwinism into our interpretation of him. We risk falling victim to what Skinner perceptively calls the “mythology of prolepsis.” S...

• العربية • Български • Català • Dansk • Deutsch • Español • Esperanto • فارسی • Français • Gaeilge • 한국어 • Hausa • Հայերեն • हिन्दी • Bahasa Indonesia • עברית • Қазақша • मराठी • Nederlands • 日本語 • Norsk bokmål • Português • Русский • Simple English • Suomi • தமிழ் • Türkçe • Українська • اردو • 中文 " Survival of the fittest" Principles of Biology (1864), in which he drew parallels between his own economic theories and Darwin's biological ones: "This survival of the fittest, which I have here sought to express in mechanical terms, is that which Mr. Darwin has called 'natural selection', or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life." Darwin responded positively to On the Origin of Species, he introduced the phrase in the fifth edition published in 1869, History of the phrase [ ] By his own account, Principles of Biology of 1864 In July 1866 Survival of the fittest. Darwin promptly replied that Wallace's letter was "as clear as daylight. I fully agree with all that you say on the advantages of H. Spencer's excellent expression of 'the survival of the fittest'. This however had not occurred to me till reading your letter. It is, however, a great objection to this term that it cannot be used as a substantive governing a verb". Had he received the letter two months earlier, he would have worked the phrase into the fourth edition of the Origin which was then being printed, and he would use it in his next book on "Domestic Animals etc.". Darwin wrote on page 6 o...