High court of andhra pradesh

High Court of Andhra Pradesh building Established 1January 2019 ;4 years ago ( 2019-01-01) Jurisdiction Location 16°31′10″N 80°29′08″E / 16.5195°N 80.4856°E / 16.5195; 80.4856 Composition method Authorized by Judge term length till the age of 62 years Number of positions 37 Website .ap .nic .in Currently Akula Venkata Sesha Sai Since 19 May 2023 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh is the History [ ] The High Court of Geography and structure [ ] The High Court is located at Amaravati. The Judges [ ] The Andhra Pradesh High Court sits at Amravati, the capital of the state of Andhra Pradesh, and can have maximum of 37 judges, of which 28 must be permanently appointed and 9 may be additionally appointed. The court currently has 30 judges. Permanent judges [ ] # Judge Date of joining Date of retirement 1 (CJ) 2 29 June 2012 25 February 2023 3 Akula Venkata Sesha Sai 12 April 2013 2 June 2024 4 Upmaka Durga Prasad Rao 23 October 2013 11 August 2024 5 DVS Suryanarayana Somayajulu 21 September 2017 25 September 2023 6 Manthoj Ganga Rao 21 September 2017 17 April 2023 7 Cheekati Manavendranath Roy 20 June 2019 20 May 2026 8 Ravi Nath Tilhari 12 December 2019 8 February 2031 9 Rao Raghunandan Rao 13 January 2020 29 June 2026 10 Battu Devanand 13 January 2020 13 April 2028 11 Donadi Ramesh 13 January 2020 26 June 2027 12 Nainala Jayasurya 13 January 2020 26 August 2030 13 Boppudi Krishna Mohan 2 May 2020 4 February 2027 14 Kanchireddy Suresh Reddy 2 May 2020 6 December 2026 15 Kumbhajad...

By Express News Service VIJAYAWADA: After 20 years of running from pillar to post, an ayah of the Women and Child Welfare Department won a battle as the High Court of Andhra Pradesh upheld the orders of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal to pay the salary to her as per regularisation norms of GO 212. A division bench held the negligence of the officials responsible for the inordinate delay in G Pullama, a native of Rajampet in Kadapa, receiving pay and perks for several years.The court dismissed the petition of the Women and Child Welfare Department challenging the AP Administrative Tribunal orders and instructed it to pay Rs 10,000 as legal expenses to Pullama. In 1986, Pullama began working as an Ayah at Kadapa Children’s Home Superintendent office. In 1994, GO 212, regularising all the employees appointed before 1993, was issued. Pullamma applied for it and received a positive response. She was appointed as an attender in Child Development Officer’s office in Railway Kodur. Increments, too, were given to her, but from June 2001, she was not being paid. Pullamma took a legal recourse and approached the AP Administrative Tribunal. In 2003, even as the Tribunal gave orders in her favour and directed the department to pay her salary, along with arrears, officials stated that her service was regularised without the notice of the finance department. They further insured orders removing her services from regularised status. Pullama approached the Tribunal once again in...

Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati Amrutha Durga vs The State Of AP BENCH – THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.V.S.S. SOMAYAJULU AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. SRINIVAS WRIT PETITION No. 41766 of 2022 DATE OF JUDGEMENT – 12 MAY 2023 FACTS In this writ petition, the petitioner challenged the order of detention of her husband Amrutha Venkayya, S/o Kotaiah, aged 41 years passed by the 2nd respondent (The Collector & District Magistrate), Krishna District, and prays to direct the respondent authorities to set the detenue at liberty forthwith. The Collector and District Magistrate, Krishna District, while categorizing the detenue as a “Bootlegger” within the definition of Section 3(1) and 3(2) r/w.2(a) and 2(b) of the A.P. Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986 (for short, ‘the Act 1 of 1986’) passed the impugned order of detention. The same was confirmed by the 1st Respondent (State). The petitioner filed writ to amend the prayer of the writ petition as ‘to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Habeas Corpus directing the 4th respondent (the Superintendent, Central Prison, Rajamahendravaram) to produce the detenue viz., Amrutha Venkayya, S./o.Kotaiah, before this Court and set him at liberty forthwith by declaring the order of detention as illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice, against Article 21 of the Constitution of Indi...

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh State has been established in the year 1954 consequent upon formation of the State of Andhra, separated from the erstwhile Madras Presidency with the Principal Seat at Guntur. In the year 1956, Hyderabad State and Andhra State had been merged and state of Andhra Pradesh formed. High Court of Andhra Pradesh had been established with Principal seat at Hyderabad and started functioning with the first team of 11 Hon’ble Judges. Hon’ble Justice Koka Subba Rao was the first Chief Justice of erstwhile High Court of Andhra Pradesh.

By Express News Service VIJAYAWADA: After 20 years of running from pillar to post, an ayah of the Women and Child Welfare Department won a battle as the High Court of Andhra Pradesh upheld the orders of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal to pay the salary to her as per regularisation norms of GO 212. A division bench held the negligence of the officials responsible for the inordinate delay in G Pullama, a native of Rajampet in Kadapa, receiving pay and perks for several years.The court dismissed the petition of the Women and Child Welfare Department challenging the AP Administrative Tribunal orders and instructed it to pay Rs 10,000 as legal expenses to Pullama. In 1986, Pullama began working as an Ayah at Kadapa Children’s Home Superintendent office. In 1994, GO 212, regularising all the employees appointed before 1993, was issued. Pullamma applied for it and received a positive response. She was appointed as an attender in Child Development Officer’s office in Railway Kodur. Increments, too, were given to her, but from June 2001, she was not being paid. Pullamma took a legal recourse and approached the AP Administrative Tribunal. In 2003, even as the Tribunal gave orders in her favour and directed the department to pay her salary, along with arrears, officials stated that her service was regularised without the notice of the finance department. They further insured orders removing her services from regularised status. Pullama approached the Tribunal once again in...

High Court of Andhra Pradesh building Established 1January 2019 ;4 years ago ( 2019-01-01) Jurisdiction Location 16°31′10″N 80°29′08″E / 16.5195°N 80.4856°E / 16.5195; 80.4856 Composition method Authorized by Judge term length till the age of 62 years Number of positions 37 Website .ap .nic .in Currently Akula Venkata Sesha Sai Since 19 May 2023 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh is the History [ ] The High Court of Geography and structure [ ] The High Court is located at Amaravati. The Judges [ ] The Andhra Pradesh High Court sits at Amravati, the capital of the state of Andhra Pradesh, and can have maximum of 37 judges, of which 28 must be permanently appointed and 9 may be additionally appointed. The court currently has 30 judges. Permanent judges [ ] # Judge Date of joining Date of retirement 1 (CJ) 2 29 June 2012 25 February 2023 3 Akula Venkata Sesha Sai 12 April 2013 2 June 2024 4 Upmaka Durga Prasad Rao 23 October 2013 11 August 2024 5 DVS Suryanarayana Somayajulu 21 September 2017 25 September 2023 6 Manthoj Ganga Rao 21 September 2017 17 April 2023 7 Cheekati Manavendranath Roy 20 June 2019 20 May 2026 8 Ravi Nath Tilhari 12 December 2019 8 February 2031 9 Rao Raghunandan Rao 13 January 2020 29 June 2026 10 Battu Devanand 13 January 2020 13 April 2028 11 Donadi Ramesh 13 January 2020 26 June 2027 12 Nainala Jayasurya 13 January 2020 26 August 2030 13 Boppudi Krishna Mohan 2 May 2020 4 February 2027 14 Kanchireddy Suresh Reddy 2 May 2020 6 December 2026 15 Kumbhajad...

Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati Amrutha Durga vs The State Of AP BENCH – THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.V.S.S. SOMAYAJULU AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. SRINIVAS WRIT PETITION No. 41766 of 2022 DATE OF JUDGEMENT – 12 MAY 2023 FACTS In this writ petition, the petitioner challenged the order of detention of her husband Amrutha Venkayya, S/o Kotaiah, aged 41 years passed by the 2nd respondent (The Collector & District Magistrate), Krishna District, and prays to direct the respondent authorities to set the detenue at liberty forthwith. The Collector and District Magistrate, Krishna District, while categorizing the detenue as a “Bootlegger” within the definition of Section 3(1) and 3(2) r/w.2(a) and 2(b) of the A.P. Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986 (for short, ‘the Act 1 of 1986’) passed the impugned order of detention. The same was confirmed by the 1st Respondent (State). The petitioner filed writ to amend the prayer of the writ petition as ‘to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Habeas Corpus directing the 4th respondent (the Superintendent, Central Prison, Rajamahendravaram) to produce the detenue viz., Amrutha Venkayya, S./o.Kotaiah, before this Court and set him at liberty forthwith by declaring the order of detention as illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice, against Article 21 of the Constitution of Indi...