Mohan is not as tall as ram

I insist that this is the only way in which we must construct this sentence. I believe: "I'm not AS tall as he" to be inelegant and "I'm not as tall as him" to be grammatically incorrect. Please can someone settle this dispute which I'm having with my contemporaries. I cite the great work of Enquire Within Upon Everything (page 90) as defence. For example, you and some others demand that the nominative form is the only viable option where as I would look at the analysis differently and say that this behaves the same was as "than" where it has both a conjunction and a prepositional usage and sentence-finally you're not likely to find nominative pronouns in the modern language we speak. I just find it fundamentally wrong that the majority of native speakers can be considered as speaking incorrectly, as for me that clearly shows there has been a reanalysis and our traditional grammars need to be updated (just one of the many of thousands of changes to our language over the last few hundred years). Some people take the view that English stopped changing around the end of the 18th century (when the first real grammar books were being published and circulated, coincidence? No...). Anyway it depends on the view you take, if you look back and see the (what I'd consider as being) old-fashioned ideals of English grammar then you might insist only the nominative is correct. On the other hand if you also know that every native English speaker knows what the more common form is and fin...

John is of the same age as Mohan. Ram is also of the same age as Mohan. State the Euclid’s axiom that illustrates the relative ages of John and Ram a. First Axiom b. Second Axiom c. Third Axiom d. Fourth Axiom Solution: It is given that Age of John = Age of Mohan Age of Ram = Age of Mohan According to Euclid’s first axiom, the things which are equal to the same thing are equal to one another. So using the Euclid’s first axiom Age of John = Age of Ram Therefore, Euclid’s first axiom can be used here. ✦ Try This: Write the correct answer: Suman is of the same age as Rohit. Rathan is also of the same age as Rohit. State the Euclid’s axiom that illustrates the relative ages of Suman and Rathan a. First Axiom, b. Second Axiom, c. Third Axiom, d. Fourth Axiom It is given that Age of Suman = Age of Rohit Age of Rathan = Age of Rohit According to Euclid’s first axiom, the things which are equal to the same thing are equal to one another. So using the Euclid’s first axiom Age of Suman = Age of Rathan Therefore, Euclid’s first axiom can be used here. ☛ Also Check: NCERT Exemplar Class 9 Maths Exercise 5.1 Sample Problem 5 John is of the same age as Mohan. Ram is also of the same age as Mohan. State the Euclid’s axiom that illustrates the relative ages of John and Ram a. First Axiom, b. Second Axiom, c. Third Axiom, d. Fourth Axiom Summary: John is of the same age as Mohan. Ram is also of the same age as Mohan. The Euclid’s axiom that illustrates the relative ages of John and Ram is ...

Transformation of sentences means to change the form of a sentence without changing its meaning. A simple sentence can be changed into a complex or a compound sentence and vice versa. Similarly, an interchange of affirmative, negative, and interrogative sentences can be done; without changing their meaning. Given below are some of the ways to transform a sentence. This grammar section explains Sentence Transformation Exercises for Class 10 CBSE With Answers PDF Transformation is a process of changing the form of a sentence without changing its basic meaning. It enables a person to express the same thing in a different way without affecting the meaning. For example: • Hurry up. Will you please hurry up? Hurry up, will you? You are requested to hurry up. • Please open the window. Will you please open the window? Would you mind opening the window? • My brother is very wise. My brother is not a fool. • Roshan is too weak to walk. Roshan is so weak that he cannot walk. In these sentences, different forms of the same sentence have been given. Notice that though their form is different their meaning is the same. Rules of Transformation A. Transformation of “subject + verb + too + Adjective/adverb + infinitive” to “principal clause (with so/such) + that + adverb clause”. • The man is too poor to pay his bills. (Simple sentence) The man is so poor that he cannot pay his bills. (Complex sentence) • Shyam is too honest to cheat. (simple) Shyam is so honest that he cannot cheat. (Comp...

Hint:The application of the concept of logical reasoning and apply logic to determine the age of Mohan. The present year is taken into consideration and also the age difference between Ram’s age and the predicted Mohan’s age in $15$ years must be kept in track and found out in order to calculate the age accurately and also determine whether both statements are required or not. Complete step by step answer: The above problem revolves around the concept of basic mathematics and logical reasoning which is required to be applied in order to find Mohan’s age. The question mentions two people namely, Mohan and Ram whose ages are said to be related to each other. We are required to predict or calculate the age of Mohan from the data given about Ram’s age. To do this we must construct an equation relating both their ages so that Mohan’s age can be found out. The first statement tells us what the age of Mohan will be in $15$ years from the current year which is presently running, with respect to Ram’s age. The second statement tells us when Ram was born which is given to be $5$ years before, that is, $5$ years back from the present year that is running. The first statement gives us the future information about their ages and the second statement gives us the past data, that is, Ram was born $5$ years ago. A point to consider here is that both the statements give data from the present year which is running. Let us now look at the first statement. It says that Mohan’s age will be twi...

The same idea can be expressed using positive, comparative and superlative adjectives. For example, all of the three sentences given below mean the same. Supriya is the smartest girl in the class. No other girl in the class is as smart as Supriya. Supriya is smarter than any other girl in the class. Exercise Rewrite the sentences given below using different degrees of comparison. 1. Shakespeare is the most famous of all writers in English. 2. Iron is more useful than any other metal. 3. I earn as much money as Ram. 4. China is larger than India. 5. Greenland is the largest island in the world. 6. Air is lighter than water. 7. I am taller than my brother. 8. Shyam is the strongest boy in the class. Answers 1. No other writer in English is as famous as Shakespeare. / Shakespeare is greater than any other writer in English. 2. No other metal is as useful as iron. / Iron is the most useful of all metals. 3. Ram does not earn more money than I do. 4. India is not as large as China. 5. Greenland is larger than any other island in the world. / No other island in the world is as large as Greenland. 6. Water is not as light as air. 7. My brother is not as tall as I am. 8. Shyam is stronger than any other boy in the class. / No other boy in the class is as strong as Shyam.

1. He is as tall as she. 2. He is not as tall as she. The first sentence says that his height is equal to that of hers (HE ＝ SHE). The second sentence is the negation of it. Logically speaking, if his height is not equal to that of hers (HE ≠ SHE), then he must be either shorter (HE ＜ SHE) or taller (HE ＞ SHE) than she. But the second sentence generally means only the former, that he is shorter than she, and not the latter. Why is this so? 1. She is the tallest of all the students in the class. 2. She is as tall as any other student in the class. The first sentence is often transliterated to the second second sentence. But if her height is equal to that of any other student in the class, how could she be the tallest? ExpThe first sentence says that his height is equal to that of hers (HE ＝ SHE). The second sentence is the negation of it. Logically speaking, if his height is not equal to that of hers (HE ≠ SHE), then he must be either shorter (HE ＜ SHE) or taller (HE ＞ SHE) than she. But the second sentence generally means only the former, that he is shorter than she, and not the latter. Why is this so?This is so because language is not mathematics. ExpThe first sentence is often transliterated to the second second sentence.Transliterated? That's the word that usually describes such things as the change from the characters of the Russian (Cyrilic) alphabet to the Roman (Western) alphabet. Maybe you mean "paraphrased". In any case, "as tall as any other" should not be used a...