Satyendar jain bail

The Delhi high court on Thursday denied bail to Aam Aadmi Party leader and former Delhi minister Delhi high court rejects bail plea of AAP leader Satyendar Jain(HT_PRINT) Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma said that Satyendar Jain is an influential person and he cannot be held to have cleared the twin conditions under PMLA. The court said that broad probabilities indicate that the accused companies associated with Jain are controlled and managed by him. The verdict comes at a time when apart from Jain, AAP's Sisodia is also in custody in connection with the Delhi liquor police case -- in a blow to the AAP. After Sisodia's arrest, both Jain and Sisodia resigned from Arvind Kejriwal's cabinet. Satyendar Jain is accused of having laundered money through four companies allegedly linked to him. On March 21, the high court heard the arguments of the ED and Jain and reserved the verdict for April 6. The high court said there was no illegality or infirmity in the trial court's order by which bail pleas were dismissed. The BJP welcomed the order and said the 'corruption degree' of Kejriwal is out again. "Once again Delhi HC now denies bail to Satyandar Jain. He is in jail for last 10 months -- is this vendetta? Manish Sisodia in jail too and denied relief by courts; called key architect of Sharab ghotala. How long can Kejriwal diver issues and defend them calling them kattar imaandar," BJP's national spokespeson Shehzad Poonawalla said.

• • • • Satyendar Jain, Who ‘Lost 35Kg’ In Jail, Granted Bail; Not Allowed To Speak To Media | 10 Points Satyendar Jain, Who ‘Lost 35Kg’ In Jail, Granted Bail; Not Allowed To Speak To Media | 10 Points As per the order, the bail has been granted till July 11 and the next Supreme Court hearing is on July 10. Satyendar Jain Granted Bail: All You Need To Know • Jain has been under custody since May 2022 as an undertrial in a money laundering case. The order was passed by a vacation bench comprising Justice JK Maheshwari and Justice PS Narasimha. • The six-week interim bail granted to Satyendar Jain allows him to get treated in a private hospital of his choice. However, the bail will be subject to conditions imposed by the trial court. The bench added that Jain shall not go to the media “to make any statement on any issue” and that he shall not attempt to influence the witnesses. • The SC bench refused to accept the Enforcement Directorate’s objection that Jain should be independently evaluated by the AIIMS Delhi. It said that this plea can be considered at a later stage. The matter will be considered next on July 11, when the bench will consider Jain’s latest medical reports. • Senior Advocate Dr Abhishek Manu Singhvi, counsel for the former Delhi Minister, submitted that he is seeking bail only on medical grounds and not on merits at present. “I have very strong grounds which I’m not touching today. I’m seeking on medical grounds today. Rest you can examine later”, he said a...

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE • It appears Manipur has been left to stew in its own juice. Is anyone listening? • Blame for Manipur violence on BJP, Narendra Modi urged to ‘speak up and take accountability’ • Finance Mministry likely to impose countervailing duty on steel imports from China • PM Modi considering contesting 2024 Lok Sabha polls from Tamil Nadu constituency • Nitish accuses Hindustani Awam Morcha Secular founder Jitan Ram Manjhi of ‘spying’ Opposition parties need to forge unity based on common minimum programme against BJP • HC extends by a day filing of nomination for Bengal rural polls for those prevented earlier • Karnataka HC quashes case against CM Siddaramaiah, Deputy CM Shivakumar for Covid rule violation • Controversy around NCERT textbooks' rationalisation unwarranted: JNU Vice-Chancellor • India's forex kitty declines by $1.32 billion to $593.75 billion for the week, says RBI • Parts of Delhi receive rainfall due to Cyclone Biparjoy, city records minimum temperature • Twitter worst among major social media platforms when it comes to LGBTQ safety: GLAAD • 5 JeM militants arrested in connection with circus worker's killing in J&K's Udhampur • Prabhas fans thrash audience member in Hyderabad for criticising 'Adipurush'

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday granted interim medical bail till July 10 to former Delhi health minister Satyendar Jain, arrested by the Enforcement Directorate in May last year. He can get treated at any private hospital of his choice in the capital but cannot speak to the media on “any issue” during his treatment. A vacation bench of Justices J K Maheshwari and P S Narasimha asked When senior advocate A M Singhvi focused only on grant of interim bail for medical treatment, citing loss of 35kg in weight, muscular atrophy and the need for a possible spinal vertebrae surgery, based on a report from G B Pant Hospital, additional solicitor general S V Raju said since the hospital was under Jain, who was the minister for health and jail, these prescriptions and diagnosis were required to be vetted by a panel of doctors either from All India Institute of Medical Sciences or Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital. But the bench said, “At present there is no reason to disbelieve the report of G B Pant Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research. We think it appropriate that the citizen has a right to take treatment of his choice, at his own expense, in a private hospital.” “We deem it appropriate to release the petitioner on interim bail on medical grounds for a limited period of six weeks. Until the next date of listing, the petitioner be released on interim bail on medical grounds, on such terms and conditions as may be imposed by the trial court, with additional cond...

The Supreme Court on Friday granted interim bail for six weeks on medical grounds to former Delhi minister and AAP leader Satyendar Jain in the money laundering case. A bench of Justice Aniruddha Bose and Justice Sanjay Karol agreed to list the matter for hearing on May 26 after senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, appearing for Jain, sought an urgent hearing of the plea on health grounds. The next hearing of the case will be held on July 10. Ahead of the hearing, the Enforcement Directorate filed its response in the apex court. In its response, ED said that Jain has been using his influence in Delhi to furnish false reports about his illness from the hospital. The agency further alleged that the former Delhi minister submitted a report of LNJP hospital in the apex court, which was previously rejected by the Delhi High Court. The ED also said that in cases linked to Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002, the bail is granted on the ground of illness only when there is a danger to life. Jain's health check-up should be done in a hospital, which is not under the Delhi government, the investigation agency further stated in its response. Bail Conditions Of Bail Granted To Jain While granting bail, the apex court imposed certain conditions on Satyendar Jain. • The top court has directed Jain to not try to influence the witnesses. • SC has asked Jain to not leave Delhi without court's permission. • The report of the treatment being done should also be given to the Supreme Court al...

By Law Today Web Desk: Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader and former Delhi minister Satyendar Jain on Monday moved Supreme Court seeking bail in the money laundering case, a month after the The Delhi high court bench led by Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma, had cited Jain as an 'influential person who may tamper with the evidence', while denying him bail in the last hearing in the case, on April 6. ALSO READ | "The present court cannot go into the validity of these proceedings. Facts show that certain disproportionate assets were masked. The court has to see the prima facie case. The broad probabilities indicate that the companies associated with him are controlled and managed by him (Satyendar Jain)," the Delhi high court had said. The verdict of the high court came at a time when another AAP minister Manish Sisodia is also in custody in connection with the Delhi liquor policy case. After Manish Sisodia was arrested by the CBI, both Sisodia and Jain resigned from the cabinet. Jain has been in custody since May last year after the Enforcement Directorate attached properties worth Rs. 4.81 crore belonging to five companies in the money laundering case against him and few others. Satyendar Jain is accused of having laundered money through four companies allegedly linked to him. Meanwhile, the Tihar Jail administration has issued a show cause notice to the superintendent of jail number 7 for transferring two inmates to former Satyendar Jain's cell, officials said on Monday.

According to the charge sheet, the AAP leader held the position of Minister in the Delhi Government from February 14, 2015, to May 31, 2017, and during that time, he obtained assets that exceed what can be accounted for by his known income. Meanwhile, a superintendent of Tihar Jail has received a show-cause notice for shifting two men to the cell of former Delhi minister and Aam Aadmi Party's jailed leader Satyendar Jain on the latter's request. "Jain in his application said he is feeling depressed and low because of loneliness. A psychiatrist suggested him for more social interactions and he requested to lodge him with at least two more persons. He also provided two persons' names, from the same ward no. 5," ANI quoted an official as saying.

Satyendar Jain moved the SC challenging the Delhi HC order which rejected his bail plea in a money laundering case Jailed former Delhi cabinet minister and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader, Besides Jain's petition, the Delhi HC last month also dismissed the bail pleas of Vaibhav Jain and Ankush Jain, both co-accused in the case. No case made against me yet: Jain in bail plea The Delhi HC rejected Jain's plea in April after reserving its order in March following the arguments of the ED and Jain's counsel. Challenging a trial court's November order rejecting his bail plea, Jain submitted before the high court in March that he had cooperated with the investigation and the ED hadn't been able to make a case against him after months of investigation. Jain claimed to have lost memory when faced with probe To recall, in June 2022, when the ED confronted him with documents related to alleged hawala transactions, he claimed to have lost his memory due to Notably, Jain approached the SC after requesting two inmates be shifted to his The jail superintendent was served a show-cause notice after transferring the inmates without the jail administration's permission.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE • From Times Square to Niagara Falls, Indian-American community sends welcome messages for PM Modi • Tamil Nadu BJP secretary Suryah arrested, Annamalai slams ruling DMK • CBI books senior BSNL officials for graft, searches 25 locations • Cyclone Biparjoy weakens into deep depression, expected to weaken further • Finance Ministry likely to impose countervailing duty on steel imports from China It appears Manipur has been left to stew in its own juice. Is anyone listening? • Indian Railways not liable to compensate passengers for theft damages, says Supreme Court • Panchayat elections: BJP fields more candidates than allies in hilly areas of Darjeeling district • United States: Military analyst Daniel Ellsberg, who leaked the Pentagon Papers, is dead; he was 92 • Case of the stolen Picasso: How and why 'Robbin’ Hood' returned the painting • European Essay Prize for Arundhati Roy, author’s commitment acknowledged • Nitish accuses Hindustani Awam Morcha Secular founder Jitan Ram Manjhi of ‘spying’ • Nato troops on ‘high alert’, backed by significant air and maritime assets • Zomato, Paytm shares tumble over rumours of SoftBank's plans to unload stakes

According to the charge sheet, the AAP leader held the position of Minister in the Delhi Government from February 14, 2015, to May 31, 2017, and during that time, he obtained assets that exceed what can be accounted for by his known income. Meanwhile, a superintendent of Tihar Jail has received a show-cause notice for shifting two men to the cell of former Delhi minister and Aam Aadmi Party's jailed leader Satyendar Jain on the latter's request. "Jain in his application said he is feeling depressed and low because of loneliness. A psychiatrist suggested him for more social interactions and he requested to lodge him with at least two more persons. He also provided two persons' names, from the same ward no. 5," ANI quoted an official as saying.