Why did uddhav resign

World's Largest Kidney Stone Removed, Know How They Are Formed; Precautionary Tips Mumbai The first indication that Uddhav Thackeray, Maharashtra’s 19th chief minister, was thinking of quitting came on June 22, two days after several Shiv Sena MLAs had cross-voted in the legislative council elections in Mumbai, and then fled to Surat in the dark of the night. A coup was underway, and a Thackeray could not afford to appear defeated was his logic when he first broached the idea with his party. Uddhav Thackeray, however, was not just the chief of the Shiv Sena but also the head of a coalition government. Sharad Pawar and other MVA leaders prevailed upon him to stay on and fight. Over the next week, however, a steady stream of Sena MLAs, some of whom he considered as insiders, continued to leave. Most prominent among them was Uday Samant, part of his crisis management group, who also defected to join Eknath Shinde. As his circle of confidantes grew smaller and smaller, Uddhav felt tricked and hurt, says a senior leader of the Shiv Sena (UBT). “He was hurt by the way a majority of the MLAS had turned against him without any dialogue.” On June 29, when the Supreme Court refused to stay then-governor BS Koshyari’s directive to take the floor test, Uddhav felt he had had enough. By this time, 38 of his MLAs had switched sides, a sufficient number to beat anti-defection provisions. Only five people knew of this decision: his wife Rashmi, his sons Aaditya and Tejas, and Sena leaders...

Uddhav Thackeray indeed is the good guy in politics – he is calm, handles crisis effectively, does not go overboard to take credit, and is humble towards his alliance partners. These traits, however, are bureaucratic. As a politician, especially one coming from the Thackeray family, he was expected to be flamboyant, accessible to friends and enemies alike, and put up a larger-than-life show. Eknath Shinde managing to steal almost 40 MLAs from right from under Uddhav Thackeray's nose is no small feat and the Sena chief must do some thinking. It’s no secret that several disgruntled MLAs, including the rebel-in-chief, Eknath Shinde, have been on the radar of investigative agencies for quite a while. Sources repeatedly told The Quint that it was to stop this cat-and-mouse chase with the agencies which led to most of the rebels supporting Shinde’s demand to ditch the MVA alliance and patch up with the BJP. One of the more surprising elements of Uddhav Thackeray’s tenure as a chief minister was his rather secular stand on most issues. He regularly took on the BJP for its communal language, be it taking a stand against Nupur Sharma’s recent remarks against the Prophet or handling of the Hanuman Chalisa row. Uddhav’s secular remarks, however, seem to have hit the nerve of his own MLAs who claim that he abandoned Shiv Sena’s and Balasaheb’s brand of Hindutva politics for power.

This is one decision that Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray must be cursing himself for. But no one knew in the summer of 2022 how the move would hurt Thackeray. On Thursday, the Supreme Court, while pronouncing its verdict on the Maharashtra political crisis, made it amply clear. How did it backfire and what does Uddhav himself have to say? By Ritika: The drama unfolded in June 2022. The summer heat was extreme and the political arena of Maharashtra was scorching too. The last scene of that drama played out on Thursday, almost after a year. But who knew that Uddhav Thackeray would likely be kicking himself for a decision he made in June last year, amid all the political heat. Uddhav knew he didn't have the support of the majority of Shiv Sena MLAs, and thought resigning would be an honourable exit, instead of facing embarassment on the floor of the house. That decision, he didn't know, would come back to bite him. And this was evident from the Supreme Court's verdict on Thursday. But what did the Supreme Court say exactly? THE MVA GOVT AND THE SHIV SENA REBELLION The Maha Vikas Aghadi government (MVA) in Maharashtra, comprising the Shiv Sena, the Sharad Pawar-led Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) and the Congress, collapsed in June 2022 following a rebellion by Eknath Shinde and his MLAs. Eknath Shinde took oath as the chief minister of Maharashtra and BJP leader Devendra Fadnavis took oath as his deputy. The political crisis in the state spiralled onto the streets, p...

Opinion | How Uddhav Thackeray was responsible for his own downfall Uddhav Thackeray may have resigned as CM, but a bigger challenge awaits him. He has to keep the Shiv Sena party from disintegrating. Most of the party stalwarts from the districts have abandoned his ship, and his party has practically become a Mumbai outfit only. The curtain has, at last, fallen on the nine-day-long suspense in Maharashtra politics, with Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray handing over his resignation to the Governor late on Wednesday night. A new coalition government will be sworn in on Thursday evening with rebel Shiv Sena leader Eknath Shinde as chief minister. The swearing-in of other ministers of the new government will take place later. On Wednesday night, Uddhav Thackeray announced his resignation through social media, minutes after the Supreme Court vacation bench, after a marathon four-hour-long hearing, refused to stay the assembly floor test ordered by the Governor. The bench said, “we are not inclined to stay the floor test ordered by the governor for tomorrow at 11 am…However the outcome of the floor test will be subject to the final decision in the petition (by SS chief whip Sunil Prabhu)”. Minutes later, Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray appeared on Facebook Live and in a 15-minute address announced his resignation, before saying, “I don’t want to play games. If those people who were brought by Sena chief want to rejoice in the fact that they pulled down his son, it is my mistake ...

Minutes after the Supreme Court refused to stay the floor test on June 30 as directed by Governor BS Koshyari, Uddhav Thackeray, in a webcast on Wednesday night announced his resignation from the Chief Minister’s post. He also declared that he will resign as a member of the Maharashtra Legislative Council. Later, he went to Raj Bhavan and handed over his resignation to the Governor. “I am resigning as CM, as I don’t want a hand in the blood of Shiv Sainiks that may be spilled tomorrow,” said Thackeray, putting up a brave front in the wake of rebellion staged by Shiv Sena legislators, led by Eknath Shinde. He said he will now start sitting again in Shiv Sena Bhavan and revive the party with youths and Sainiks. “In a democracy, heads are counted to show numbers. I am not interested in that. I don’t want to play these games. Tomorrow, they will say they have brought down Shiv Sena supremo Balasaheb Thackeray’s son,” he said, adding, “I came to power unexpectedly, and I’m exiting in a similar manner.” He said Shiv Sena is one family, and he will not let it be pulled apart. “I am not going anywhere, I will gather all our supporters, we will recoup,” he said. Thackeray hailed the allies – the NCP and the Congress – for their strong support and cooperation in the last two-and-a-half years but expressed serious displeasure over betrayal by his own party leaders. “I want to thank NCP President Sharad Pawar and Congress President Sonia Gandhi and also state leaders for extending the...

With the view growing that the Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena might have painted itself into a corner with its According to sources, Uddhav had made up his mind to resign soon after it became clear that the situation had slipped out of his hands. But Pawar prevailed upon him to put up a fight, thus squandering, what many leaders say, “a moral high ground”. Soon as the news broke of the revolt within the Also Read | This was the reason, sources said, that he very publicly removed his belongings from Varsha and moved the same into his personal residence Matoshree – accompanied by sons Aaditya and Tejas, and wife Rashmi. The distance between the two residences was covered like a grand farewell, with supporters hailing them and breaking down, and the family showing its gratitude for their backing. An insider said, the plan then was to make “a graceful exit”. That is why the announcement of the However, the leader said, “Pawar asked him to hold on and not take any hasty decision. It was also impressed upon him that the Maha Vikas Aghadi would collectively fight the battle against the According to sources, even after this, Uddhav expressed his wish to resign as there was no let-up in the MLAs turning sides and joining the Eknatth Shinde-led faction in While opinion is divided, a section believes Uddhav might have made a bad situation worse by staying up, giving the impression of being led by the NCP. One of the main charges the rebels have against the Sena leadership is that it ...

World's Largest Kidney Stone Removed, Know How They Are Formed; Precautionary Tips New Delhi Uddhav Thackeray’s decision to resign as chief minister even before the trust vote could take place precluded a clear-cut conclusion on how the Eknath Shinde faction would have impacted the Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA) government on the floor of the House, the Supreme Court observed on Thursday, adding it could be an impediment in Uddhav’s path when he impels the court to put the clock back by reinstating him as CM. Uddhav resigned on June 29 last year, hours after the top court declined to stay the floor test scheduled to be held a day later on the directive of the Maharashtra governor. Citing this, a Constitution bench, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, pointed out that the decision that Uddhav made on June 29 ruled out ascertaining how his rival faction, led by Shinde, would have acted inside the House. “If you would have faced the trust vote and lost then it would have been clear that if the 39 people made a difference and it would show if these 39 affected the trust vote or otherwise... Did you not preclude the consideration of this possibility by not facing the trust vote?” the bench asked senior counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi, who represented the Uddhav camp. Singhvi, on his part, replied that after the top court refused to stay the floor test despite injuncting the then deputy speaker of the assembly to decide the disqualification petitions a...