Indian kanoon

Declaration about Consultation with a Lawyer:- To comply with regulations stipulated by the Bar Council of India that does not permit solicitation in any form or manner, by accessing this site ( www.kanoonirai.com ) you acknowledge that you are seeking information of your own accord and volition and that no form of solicitation has taken place by Kanoonirai and its experts. You acknowledge that there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our experts to solicit any work through this website. You wish to gain more information and use the information provided there to the user only. On your specific request, any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at your’s volition and any transmission, receipt or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship. The information provided under this website is solely available at your request for informational purposes only, should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement.

Act ID: 190805 Act Number: 05 Enactment Date: 1908-03-21 Act Year: 1908 Short Title: The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Long Title: An Act to consolidate and amend the laws relating to the procedure of the Courts of Civil Judicature. Ministry: Ministry of Law and Justice Department: Legislative Department Enforcement Date: 01-01-1909 Last Updated: 31-12-2018 PRELIMINARY• PART I • SUITS IN GENERAL • • • • • • • • PART II • EXECUTION • • • • • • • • • • • • • PART III • INCIDENTAL PROCEEDINGS • • PART IV • SUITS IN PARTICULAR CASES • • • • • PART V • SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS • • • • PART VI • • PART VII • APPEALS • • • • • • PART VIII • • PART IX • • PART X • • PART XI • Disclaimer: Updating and uploading of all Central Acts available on this web page is the proprietary of the Legislative Department in the Ministry of Law and Justice. The updating and uploading of Rules, Regulations, Notifications, etc., and linking them with relevant sections of the respective Principal Act under which the said subordinate legislations have been made is the proprietary of the concerned Ministry/Departments in the Government of India administering subject matter of the Legislation.

In October 2020, a complaint was filed with the Supreme Court of Kerala seeking the annulment of a court decision on the Indian website Kanoon claiming a right to be forgotten. The applicant objected to the reproduction of the bail order, arguing that he had subsequently been acquitted in that case and that, as a result, the bail order had become “outdated, irrelevant, insufficient and excessive”. The complainant also alleged that the bail order incorrectly indicated the criminal number of the case against him at the police station. A lawsuit may very well get a lot of media coverage – newspapers, TV and radio, Twitter and other social media – and still NOT be published in a series of legislative reports. To be published in a series of legislative reports, the case must have legal significance, that is, make the law in any way. Indian Kanoon is a popular website that offers the public free access to court decisions and laws in an easily searchable format. The site celebrated its 13th anniversary yesterday and democratized access to the law in India. Court orders available on Indian Kanoon are automatically removed and reproduced from Supreme Court, Supreme Court, District Courts, and Courts websites. Indian Kanoon does not process or remove court orders from its website except to alter the personally identifiable details of victims of sexual violence. You can read Indian Kanoon`s case suppression policy here. Knowing in which country the case was heard is not always as eas...

• Sudheesh, Raghul (27 June 2012). Bar and Bench . Retrieved 29 January 2022. • . Retrieved 29 January 2022. • . Retrieved 29 January 2022. • Richards, Robert (1 June 2011). Slaw . Retrieved 29 January 2022. Further reading [ ] • Iyengar, Prashant (2011). • Sinha, Sushant. Pratt, Judith (ed.). . Retrieved 29 January 2022. News • • {{

Power your website with the state of art legal search and the largest legal database • Get search functionality same as Indian Kanoon. • Customize your queries using all supported filters and operators. • Get any legal document on Indian Kanoon and show it on your website with your styling. • Get text fragments in a legal document for any search query. Already a customer. Sign in below Email Address*: Password*:

The The heinous crimes recognized by all cultures which are “sexual offenses''. These are considered brutal and inhuman as they skillfully take the state of sexual cruelty which causes incurable harm to the physical and mental prosperity of the victim. It can likewise be considered as an attack in which grown-ups or kids are instigated without their assent. The victims experience various wounds that can incorporate high dangers of harm to the contraceptive wellbeing, permanent sicknesses, intense depression, self-destruction, and so on. The Indian Penal Code has hence provided various rules and punishments for such offenses. . What is section 376 B? puts more light on it and provides for punishment for such activities if done by a husband to his wife when separated. According to IPC, Section 376B is read as under: Whoever has sex with his own better half, who is living independently, regardless of whether under an announcement of partition or something else, without her assent, will be rebuffed with the detainment of one or the other portrayal for a term which will not be under two years yet which may stretch out to seven years, and will likewise be obligated to fine. So basically, Section 376B talks about the sexual intercourse by the spouse upon his significant other during detachment or any kind of partition or the period of separation. For eg: There is a case filed for divorce by a couple and during the separation period, the husband has intercourse with his wife. Upon...

New Delhi, Jan 29 (PTI) The Delhi High Court has asked India Kanoon to consider removing from its website a trial court judgement relating to a matrimonial dispute, pending a decision on a woman’s plea for invoking the right to be forgotten. Justice Kameswar Rao issued notice and sought response of the Centre, Google and India Kanoon, which is a search engine for Indian law, on the woman’s plea urging the court to restrain India Kanoon from sharing the 2018 trial court judgement relating to her case. The court fixed the matter for further hearing on February 17, when several other similar petitions involving the question of the right to be forgotten are also listed. Advocate Amit George, representing the petitioner woman, showed the court the judgement available on India Kanoon’s website and urged that it be restrained from sharing. “Since I have issued notice to respondent no. 2 (India Kanoon) for February 17, when other pending matters are listed, appropriate shall be that upon receiving the notice, respondent no. 2 may consider removing the judgement of the trial court passed in 2018,” the judge said. The court was hearing a plea by a woman who was involved in the matrimonial dispute and was aggrieved by the availability and accessibility of the judgement on India Kanoon through the search engine Google. The woman said the judgement included her personal details. PTI SKV RT RT This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its ...