Nehru report

  1. What was the 1928 Nehru report? – Mexico
  2. Nehru’s Report
  3. The Nehru Report of 1928
  4. THE NEHRU COMMITTEE REPORT 1928 – Aishwarya Sandeep
  5. Nehru Report: Its Significance and Effects
  6. Do you know the difference between Simon Commission Report and Nehru Report
  7. Nehru Report on Constitutional Framework for the Country
  8. What was the 1928 Nehru report? – Mexico
  9. Nehru Report: Its Significance and Effects
  10. Nehru’s Report


Download: Nehru report
Size: 9.15 MB

What was the 1928 Nehru report? – Mexico

Contents • 1 What was the 1928 Nehru report? • 1.1 What was the importance of Nehru report? • 2 Why did Jinnah produce 14 points? • 2.1 How many members are there in Nehru report? • 3 What was the result of the Delhi report? What was the 1928 Nehru report? The Nehru Report of 28 August 1928 was a memorandum to appeal for a new dominion status and a federal set-up of government for the constitution of India. It also proposed for the Joint Electorates with reservation of seats for minorities in the legislatures. What did the Nehru report recommend? Recommendations of the report Nineteen fundamental rights including the right to vote for men and women above 21 years of age, unless disqualified. Equal rights for men and women as citizens. No state religion. No separate electorates for any community. What is conclusion of Nehru report? Conclusion: The Nehru Report was nothing else than a Congress document and thus totally opposed by Muslims of the Sub-continent. The Hindus under Congress threatened the government with a disobedience movement if the Nehru report was not implemented into the Act by December 31, 1929. What was the importance of Nehru report? It was important because The Nehru Report demanded that the Fundamental Rights for the people of India wouldn’t be subjected to forfeiture. The reports had drowned an inspiration from the American bill of rights which laid to the foundation of Fundamental Rights provision in the Indian Constitution. Who disapproved the Nehru R...

Nehru’s Report

In order to broaden and review the British Raj and the Government of India Act, 1919 a seven-member Statutory Commission was set up by the British government to examine the issue of further constitutional reform. The two mainstream parties, Congress and the Muslim League, countered the commission in their own way and received full public support when the commission landed in Bombay, through rallies, boycotts, and hartals. The Indians were challenged to draft a constitution that was acceptable to all Indians, all parties, and all provinces. The challenge was taken seriously and the All-Party Conference took place, with all parties, including Congress and the Muslim League, working enthusiastically and collectively to finalize the recommendations of the report popularly known as the Nehru Report. Political Scenario Appointment of Simon Commission India was Britain’s most priced colony, to win the election against Labour Party in Britain, the Conservative Government, also in power, under the prime minister Stanley Baldwin appointed an each-white seven Indian Statutory Commission on November 8, 1927, to review the Government of India Act 1919 and to go into the question of further indigenous reform. The Commission was popularly known as Simon Commission as it was headed or chaired by Sir John Simon. At that, time the British government was not in a mood of accepting the demand of Swaraj. The Commission’s rejection of indigenous peoples enraged the Indians and the introductory ...

The Nehru Report of 1928

The Nehru Report of 1928 Background Toward the end of 1927, the British government, as it had promised in the government of India Act,1919, appointed a statutory commission to inquire into the working of the Montagu-Chelmsford reforms and propose constitutional reforms for British India. All members of the commission were British and no Indian was represented on it. In a speech in the House of Lords, Lord Birkenhead, the then Secretary of state for India, said that any commission on which Indians were represented could not present a unanimous report. He further said, “If they have any political capability and competence, they should form a unanimous constitution and present it to us and we will implement it.” The leadership of the Indian National Congress (INC) took this speech of Lord Birkenhead as a challenge to Indian politicians. The INC called an All parties Conference in January 1928 under the president ship of Dr. M.A. Ansari. The purpose of the conference was to protest against the composition of the Simon Commission and to prepare a Constitution for British India. Around one hundred delegates from all important/large parties of British India attended the conference. These parties included the Indian National Congress (INC), All India Muslim League (AIML), National Liberal Federation, Hindu Mahasabha, Central Sikh League, etc. The conference failed to conclude the issue of the rights of minorities. The second round of the All Parties Conference was held in March of...

THE NEHRU COMMITTEE REPORT 1928 – Aishwarya Sandeep

INTRODUCTION TheNehru Committee Reportof 10 August 1928 was a memorandum outlining a proposed new BACKGROUND OF NEHRU REPORT British policy, until almost the end of the Raj, was that the timing and nature of Indian constitutional development was to be decided exclusively by the British Parliament, but it was assumed that Indians would be consulted as appropriate. This was formally stated in the Government of India Act 1919 . Britain did not acknowledge the right of Indians to frame their own constitution until the 1942 Cripps Declaration . A nonofficial effort to … (to draft a new constitution was) made by Mrs. Besant and a few of her Indian friends. Most of the leaders were rather cool toward her project, but it was somewhat revised by a so-called All-Parties Conference which met at Delhi in January–February, 1925, and was formally approved by a convention held at Cawnpore in April. It was drafted as a statute and introduced in the House of Commons by Mr. George Lansbury, December 9, 1925, under the title, “The Commonwealth of India Bill.” The bill proposed to confer upon India at once the full status of a Dominion, subject to certain temporary reservations. The Viceroy, as the representative of the King-Emperor, was to have complete charge of military and naval forces and foreign relations until the Indian Parliament by its own act should signify its readiness to assume control. Any step taken by the Indian Parliament concerning the Indian States must have the previous a...

Nehru Report: Its Significance and Effects

The On sub-continent politics, the Nehru Report had a significant effect. It prepared the ground for the creation of two separate countries the Republic of India and the People’s Republic of Pakistan in 1947 and served to bring together the various independence movement groups. What Was the Nehru Report? A solution to the conflict between Muslims and Hindus on the Indian subcontinent was put up in the Nehru report. Jawaharlal Nehru, who would eventually serve as India’s first Prime Minister, was the report’s primary author. According to the research, the subcontinent should be split into two nations: one for Muslims and one for Hindus. The plan generated a lot of debate before being rejected. It is still significant because it demonstrates the challenges Indian authorities were dealing with at the time and the varied answers being put forth. What Were the Main Objectives of the Nehru Report? A key turning point in the Indian independence struggle was the Nehru Report. It was given to the British administration in How Did the Nehru Report Attempt to Tackle Communal Politics? The Nehru Report described the future of the Indian subcontinent. It demanded the establishment of a secular state with respect for all religions. Muslims were to have their autonomous region within the Indian country. Untouchability was also to be abolished according to the Nehru Report. What Was the Immediate and Long-Term The populace reacted to the Nehru Report with quick excitement and protests. It...

Do you know the difference between Simon Commission Report and Nehru Report

Simon Commission was constituted to look into the functioning of the constitutional system in India and suggest changes. Whereas Nehru Report was a strong response given by the leadership of the Indian National Congress to challenge the inability of the Government of the British Government to make a constitution unfit. In this article we are giving the difference between Simon Commission Report and Nehru Report which is very useful for the competitive examinations like UPSC-prelims, SSC, State Services, NDA, CDS, and Railways etc. The Government of British India has been implementing the Act from time to time to check the functioning of government and improve the administration system. In this context, Simon Commission was constituted under the leadership of Sir John Simon to look into the functioning of the constitutional system in India and suggest changes. Nehru report was the first major Indian effort to draft a constitutional framework for the country. This report, issued in August 1928, was a strong response given by the leadership of the Indian National Congress to challenge the inability of the Government of the British Government to make a constitution unfit. Difference between Simon Commission Report and Nehru Report Simon Commission Report Nehru Report 1. India was not recommended to give given Dominion status. 1. India would be given Dominion status. This means independence within the British Commonwealth. 2. This report opposes the establishment of responsible...

Nehru Report on Constitutional Framework for the Country

ADVERTISEMENTS: Nehru report on constitutional framework for the country: As an answer to Lord Birkenhead’s challenge, an All Parties Conference met in February 1928 and appointed a sub­committee under the chairmanship of Motilal Nehru to draft a constitution. This was the first major attempt by the Indians to draft a constitutional framework for the country. ADVERTISEMENTS: The committee included Tej Bahadur Sapru, Subhash Bose, M.S. Aney, Mangal Singh, Ali Imam, Shuab Qureshi and G.R. Pradhan as its members. The report was finalised by August 1928. The recommendations of the Nehru Committee were unanimous except in one respect—while the majority favoured the “dominion status” as the basis of the Constitution, a section of it wanted “complete independence” as the basis, with the majority section giving the latter section liberty of action. Main Recommendations: The Nehru Report confined itself to British India, as it envisaged the future link-up of British India with the princely states on a federal basis. For the dominion it recommended: 1. Dominion status op lines of self-governing dominions as the form of government desired by Indians (much to the chagrin of younger, militant section—Nehru being prominent among them). ADVERTISEMENTS: 2. Rejection of separate electorates which had been the basis of constitutional reforms so far; instead, a demand for joint electorates with reservation of seats for Muslims at the centre and in provinces where they were in minority (and n...

What was the 1928 Nehru report? – Mexico

Contents • 1 What was the 1928 Nehru report? • 1.1 What was the importance of Nehru report? • 2 Why did Jinnah produce 14 points? • 2.1 How many members are there in Nehru report? • 3 What was the result of the Delhi report? What was the 1928 Nehru report? The Nehru Report of 28 August 1928 was a memorandum to appeal for a new dominion status and a federal set-up of government for the constitution of India. It also proposed for the Joint Electorates with reservation of seats for minorities in the legislatures. What did the Nehru report recommend? Recommendations of the report Nineteen fundamental rights including the right to vote for men and women above 21 years of age, unless disqualified. Equal rights for men and women as citizens. No state religion. No separate electorates for any community. What is conclusion of Nehru report? Conclusion: The Nehru Report was nothing else than a Congress document and thus totally opposed by Muslims of the Sub-continent. The Hindus under Congress threatened the government with a disobedience movement if the Nehru report was not implemented into the Act by December 31, 1929. What was the importance of Nehru report? It was important because The Nehru Report demanded that the Fundamental Rights for the people of India wouldn’t be subjected to forfeiture. The reports had drowned an inspiration from the American bill of rights which laid to the foundation of Fundamental Rights provision in the Indian Constitution. Who disapproved the Nehru R...

Nehru Report: Its Significance and Effects

The On sub-continent politics, the Nehru Report had a significant effect. It prepared the ground for the creation of two separate countries the Republic of India and the People’s Republic of Pakistan in 1947 and served to bring together the various independence movement groups. What Was the Nehru Report? A solution to the conflict between Muslims and Hindus on the Indian subcontinent was put up in the Nehru report. Jawaharlal Nehru, who would eventually serve as India’s first Prime Minister, was the report’s primary author. According to the research, the subcontinent should be split into two nations: one for Muslims and one for Hindus. The plan generated a lot of debate before being rejected. It is still significant because it demonstrates the challenges Indian authorities were dealing with at the time and the varied answers being put forth. What Were the Main Objectives of the Nehru Report? A key turning point in the Indian independence struggle was the Nehru Report. It was given to the British administration in How Did the Nehru Report Attempt to Tackle Communal Politics? The Nehru Report described the future of the Indian subcontinent. It demanded the establishment of a secular state with respect for all religions. Muslims were to have their autonomous region within the Indian country. Untouchability was also to be abolished according to the Nehru Report. What Was the Immediate and Long-Term The populace reacted to the Nehru Report with quick excitement and protests. It...

Nehru’s Report

In order to broaden and review the British Raj and the Government of India Act, 1919 a seven-member Statutory Commission was set up by the British government to examine the issue of further constitutional reform. The two mainstream parties, Congress and the Muslim League, countered the commission in their own way and received full public support when the commission landed in Bombay, through rallies, boycotts, and hartals. The Indians were challenged to draft a constitution that was acceptable to all Indians, all parties, and all provinces. The challenge was taken seriously and the All-Party Conference took place, with all parties, including Congress and the Muslim League, working enthusiastically and collectively to finalize the recommendations of the report popularly known as the Nehru Report. Political Scenario Appointment of Simon Commission India was Britain’s most priced colony, to win the election against Labour Party in Britain, the Conservative Government, also in power, under the prime minister Stanley Baldwin appointed an each-white seven Indian Statutory Commission on November 8, 1927, to review the Government of India Act 1919 and to go into the question of further indigenous reform. The Commission was popularly known as Simon Commission as it was headed or chaired by Sir John Simon. At that, time the British government was not in a mood of accepting the demand of Swaraj. The Commission’s rejection of indigenous peoples enraged the Indians and the introductory ...