The police station is ____ the right

Photo courtesy iStock: tzahiV A Pennsylvania man did not have a First Amendment right to record video in the lobby of a police department, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania has ruled. The court reasoned that the restriction on filming in the lobby was a reasonable time, place, and manner restriction on speech that was narrowly tailored to protect the privacy of confidential informants, undercover officers, and crime victims. On Jan. 25, 2018, Kevin Ray Bradley entered the lobby of the Williamsport Bureau Police Department and started filming with his cell phone. In the lobby was a sign that read: “Recording, taping, photographing strictly prohibited.” Cpl. Brian McGee informed Bradley no filming was allowed in the lobby. Bradley replied that he had a constitutional right to film the police in the lobby. McGee asked Bradley several times to stop filming, but he did not comply. When McGee attempted to take the phone, Bradley pulled away. Several officers assisted McGee and took Bradley into custody, arresting him for the offense of defiant trespass. That law provides in part: “A person commits an offense [of defiant trespass] if, knowing that he is not licensed or privileged to do so, he enters or remains in any place as to which notice against trespass is given by actual communication to the actor.” A jury found Bradley guilty and the trial court sentenced him to one year of probation. On appeal, Bradley contended that he had a Commonwealth v. Bradley. The Superior Court a...

Get peer support online Get peer support online • • Our mission is to deliver a better life for people severely affected by mental illness. Our network of groups, services and advice lines are on hand to get you the support you need. Use your postcode to search your area. Search • Advice and information Police stations What happens if I'm arrested? This section looks at what happens when the police arrest you if they think you have committed a crime. It looks at your rights at the police station and what happens after you have been arrested. It also looks at what the outcome might be. This information is for adults affected by mental illness in England and their loved ones and carers. It’s also for anyone else interested in the subject. If you would like more advice or information you can contact our Advice and Information Service by clicking here. Overview • The police can arrest you if they think you’ve committing a crime. You can be taken to a police station. • If you’re arrested, you have 3 basic rights. They are: • free legal advice, • the right to let someone know you have been arrested, and • the right to look at the police Codes of Practice. • If you are vulnerable, you also have the right to have an appropriate adult with you at the police station. They can help you understand what is going on. A medical professional should see you too. • At the police station you might meet other people like the custody sergeant, custody detention officers, health care profession...

At is the correct choice in this case. The debates about "at vs in" never cease. In this case, it would seem, "at" would indicate that the person is at a certain place performing a task, or tasks, characteristic of that place (such as filing a complaint). "In" would indicate that he or she popped into the police station on some business that isn't directly related to police matters. A century ago folks used to say "I've just arrived at Paris," whereas now they say "I've just arrived in Paris." Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange! • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research! But avoid … • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience. To learn more, see our

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this help guide does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only. Accept and close Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp The Right to Silence at the Police Station A suspect enjoys the right to silence at the police station however if the suspect remains silent, is charged and then advances a defence at trial there is a danger that the court may draw adverse inferences against his silence under s34 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. Adverse inferences may also be drawn where the suspect fails to account for objects found on his person s36 or his presence at a particular place s37. Where a defendant produces facts at his trial which he failed to mention at interview he may have an adverse inference drawn against him if the court considers it was reasonable at the time for the defendant to have advanced the facts of his defence. The rationale behind s34 is that if the defendant has an explanation to put forward in relation to any allegation this must be done at the first available opportunity. The case of R v Argent 1997 2 Cr APP R 27 provides the conditions that must be met before the court may draw adverse inferences as follows: • There must be proceedings against the person for an offence • The alleged failure to answer questions mu...

Taking photographs and video of things that are plainly visible in public spaces is a constitutional right—and that includes police and other government officials carrying out their duties. However, there is a widespread, continuing pattern of law enforcement officers ordering people to stop taking photographs or video in public places and harassing, detaining, and arresting those who fail to comply. The right of citizens to record the police is a critical check and balance. It creates an independent record of what took place in a particular incident, free from accusations of bias, lying, or faulty memory. It is no accident that some of the most high-profile cases of police misconduct have involved video and audio records. The ACLU has fought—and will keep fighting—to ensure that the right to film and photograph the police is respected by law enforcement officials.

Get peer support online Get peer support online • • Our mission is to deliver a better life for people severely affected by mental illness. Our network of groups, services and advice lines are on hand to get you the support you need. Use your postcode to search your area. Search • Advice and information Police stations What happens if I'm arrested? This section looks at what happens when the police arrest you if they think you have committed a crime. It looks at your rights at the police station and what happens after you have been arrested. It also looks at what the outcome might be. This information is for adults affected by mental illness in England and their loved ones and carers. It’s also for anyone else interested in the subject. If you would like more advice or information you can contact our Advice and Information Service by clicking here. Overview • The police can arrest you if they think you’ve committing a crime. You can be taken to a police station. • If you’re arrested, you have 3 basic rights. They are: • free legal advice, • the right to let someone know you have been arrested, and • the right to look at the police Codes of Practice. • If you are vulnerable, you also have the right to have an appropriate adult with you at the police station. They can help you understand what is going on. A medical professional should see you too. • At the police station you might meet other people like the custody sergeant, custody detention officers, health care profession...

Taking photographs and video of things that are plainly visible in public spaces is a constitutional right—and that includes police and other government officials carrying out their duties. However, there is a widespread, continuing pattern of law enforcement officers ordering people to stop taking photographs or video in public places and harassing, detaining, and arresting those who fail to comply. The right of citizens to record the police is a critical check and balance. It creates an independent record of what took place in a particular incident, free from accusations of bias, lying, or faulty memory. It is no accident that some of the most high-profile cases of police misconduct have involved video and audio records. The ACLU has fought—and will keep fighting—to ensure that the right to film and photograph the police is respected by law enforcement officials.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this help guide does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only. Accept and close Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp The Right to Silence at the Police Station A suspect enjoys the right to silence at the police station however if the suspect remains silent, is charged and then advances a defence at trial there is a danger that the court may draw adverse inferences against his silence under s34 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. Adverse inferences may also be drawn where the suspect fails to account for objects found on his person s36 or his presence at a particular place s37. Where a defendant produces facts at his trial which he failed to mention at interview he may have an adverse inference drawn against him if the court considers it was reasonable at the time for the defendant to have advanced the facts of his defence. The rationale behind s34 is that if the defendant has an explanation to put forward in relation to any allegation this must be done at the first available opportunity. The case of R v Argent 1997 2 Cr APP R 27 provides the conditions that must be met before the court may draw adverse inferences as follows: • There must be proceedings against the person for an offence • The alleged failure to answer questions mu...

Photo courtesy iStock: tzahiV A Pennsylvania man did not have a First Amendment right to record video in the lobby of a police department, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania has ruled. The court reasoned that the restriction on filming in the lobby was a reasonable time, place, and manner restriction on speech that was narrowly tailored to protect the privacy of confidential informants, undercover officers, and crime victims. On Jan. 25, 2018, Kevin Ray Bradley entered the lobby of the Williamsport Bureau Police Department and started filming with his cell phone. In the lobby was a sign that read: “Recording, taping, photographing strictly prohibited.” Cpl. Brian McGee informed Bradley no filming was allowed in the lobby. Bradley replied that he had a constitutional right to film the police in the lobby. McGee asked Bradley several times to stop filming, but he did not comply. When McGee attempted to take the phone, Bradley pulled away. Several officers assisted McGee and took Bradley into custody, arresting him for the offense of defiant trespass. That law provides in part: “A person commits an offense [of defiant trespass] if, knowing that he is not licensed or privileged to do so, he enters or remains in any place as to which notice against trespass is given by actual communication to the actor.” A jury found Bradley guilty and the trial court sentenced him to one year of probation. On appeal, Bradley contended that he had a Commonwealth v. Bradley. The Superior Court a...

At is the correct choice in this case. The debates about "at vs in" never cease. In this case, it would seem, "at" would indicate that the person is at a certain place performing a task, or tasks, characteristic of that place (such as filing a complaint). "In" would indicate that he or she popped into the police station on some business that isn't directly related to police matters. A century ago folks used to say "I've just arrived at Paris," whereas now they say "I've just arrived in Paris." Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange! • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research! But avoid … • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience. To learn more, see our